← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

SPS3

Effects of Clopidogrel Added to Aspirin in Patients with Recent Lacunar Stroke

Year of Publication: 2012

Authors: The SPS3 Investigators

Journal: The New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: N Engl J Med 2012;367:817-25.

Link: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1204133

PDF: https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1204133


Clinical Question

In patients with recent symptomatic MRI-confirmed lacunar stroke, does adding clopidogrel to aspirin reduce the risk of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin alone?


Study Overview

Objective

To determine whether dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin + clopidogrel) and lower systolic blood pressure targets reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with recent lacunar stroke.

Study Summary

  • Dual antiplatelet therapy increased the risk of major bleeding and mortality without reducing recurrent stroke compared to aspirin alone.
  • Lower blood pressure target showed a non-significant trend toward reduced stroke risk.

Intervention

2x2 factorial design: (1) Aspirin + clopidogrel vs. aspirin alone; and (2) systolic blood pressure target <130 mm Hg vs. 130–149 mm Hg in patients with MRI-confirmed recent lacunar stroke.

Patients per Arm

Antiplatelet: 1503 dual vs. 1516 aspirin alone; BP: 1491 lower target vs. 1528 higher target.

Bottom Line

Among patients with recent MRI-confirmed lacunar strokes, adding clopidogrel to aspirin did not significantly reduce recurrent stroke but significantly increased major bleeding and all-cause mortality, and the antiplatelet arm was stopped early for harm. These findings do not support dual antiplatelet therapy for long-term secondary prevention in this population. The blood-pressure-target component of the trial was ongoing at time of this publication.

Major Points

  • Largest randomized trial of secondary prevention specifically in MRI-confirmed lacunar stroke. 2×2 factorial design testing: (1) aspirin + clopidogrel vs. aspirin alone (antiplatelet arm, reported here), and (2) intensive vs. standard SBP target (BP-target arm was ongoing at publication; results anticipated in 2012).
  • 3,020 patients with MRI-confirmed lacunar stroke (subcortical infarct ≤2.0 cm) within the preceding 180 days, with randomization at least 2 weeks after the qualifying stroke to avoid acute BP lowering. Enrolled at 82 centers across North America, Latin America, and Spain.
  • Antiplatelet arm: Primary outcome (any recurrent stroke) not reduced with DAPT — 2.5%/yr vs. 2.7%/yr (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72–1.16, P=0.48).
  • DAPT harm: major hemorrhage nearly doubled (2.1 vs. 1.1%/yr; HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.41–2.71, P<0.001). All-cause mortality significantly increased (2.1 vs. 1.4%/yr; HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.14–2.04, P=0.004). Antiplatelet arm stopped early by DSMB for futility with evidence of harm.
  • Recurrent ischemic stroke was numerically but non-significantly reduced with DAPT (2.0 vs. 2.4%/yr; HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.63–1.09), offset by a non-significant increase in intracranial hemorrhage (0.42 vs. 0.25%/yr; HR 1.65, 95% CI 0.83–3.31).
  • Key conclusion: DAPT is harmful for long-term secondary prevention after lacunar stroke — in contrast to the short-course benefit seen in acute minor stroke/TIA in CHANCE and POINT (DAPT used for ~21 days).
  • Aspirin dose was 325 mg — higher than the 75–100 mg typically used in combination with clopidogrel in CHANCE/POINT and most modern DAPT regimens.
  • No significant interaction between the antiplatelet and BP-target randomizations for the primary outcome (P=0.46 for interaction), supporting independent evaluation of the two components of the 2×2 factorial design.
  • MRI confirmation of lacunar infarct ≤2.0 cm was required for enrollment — one of the strictest imaging-verified small-vessel-disease populations studied, distinguishing SPS3 from trials relying on clinical lacunar syndromes alone.
  • Excess mortality with DAPT (HR 1.52, P=0.004) was NOT fully explained by fatal hemorrhages (HR 2.29, P=0.17) — raising concern about unexplained DAPT toxicity in this population, possibly related to underlying small-vessel disease.

Design

Study Type: Double-blind (antiplatelet component), multicenter, randomized trial with a 2×2 factorial design.

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Antiplatelet component: double-blind. Blood-pressure-target component: open-label (patients and practitioners aware of BP assignment).

Enrollment Period: 2003 to 2011.

Follow-up Duration: Mean of 3.4 years (range 0 to 8.2).

Centers: 82

Countries: North America, Latin America, Spain

Sample Size: 3020

Analysis: Intention-to-treat.


Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥30 years.
  • Symptomatic lacunar stroke within the preceding 180 days, with randomization occurring at least 2 weeks after the qualifying stroke.
  • MRI confirmation: lesion ≤2.0 cm in diameter on diffusion-weighted imaging with corresponding positive apparent-diffusion-coefficient image, or well-delineated area of focal hyperintensity ≤2.0 cm on FLAIR or T2-weighted imaging, in a location consistent with a lacunar syndrome (internal capsule, thalamus, basal ganglia, pons, corona radiata, or centrum semiovale).
  • Clinical presentation consistent with a lacunar syndrome (pure motor hemiparesis, pure sensory stroke, sensorimotor stroke, ataxic hemiparesis, or dysarthria-clumsy hand); transient lacunar ischemic attacks required diffusion-weighted MRI evidence.
  • Modified Rankin Scale <4 (non-disabling).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Disabling stroke (modified Rankin score ≥4).
  • Previous nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage or previous cortical ischemic stroke.
  • Surgically amenable ipsilateral carotid artery disease (paper does not specify a stenosis threshold).
  • Major-risk cardioembolic source (per protocol; specific list not enumerated in the primary paper).
  • MRI evidence of a recent or remote cortical infarct, or a large subcortical infarct (>1.5 cm).

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive
Mean age (yr)6363
Male sex (%)6462
Race or ethnic group (White) (%)5252
Race or ethnic group (Hispanic) (%)3131
Race or ethnic group (Black) (%)1717
History of hypertension (%)7476
Mean blood pressure at screening (mm Hg)143/78143/78
Diabetes (%)3835
Ischemic heart disease (%)1110
Previous clinical stroke or TIA (%)1515
Current tobacco smoker (%)2120
Use of aspirin at time of qualifying event (%)2828
Use of statin at any follow-up visit (%)8584

Arms

FieldControlAspirin plus Clopidogrel
Intervention325 mg of enteric-coated aspirin daily plus a matching placebo for clopidogrel.325 mg of enteric-coated aspirin daily plus 75 mg of clopidogrel daily.
DurationMean of 3.4 yearsMean of 3.4 years

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Any recurrent stroke, including ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (including subdural hematomas).Primary2.7% per year (138 strokes)2.5% per year (125 strokes)0.920.48
Ischemic strokeSecondary2.4% per year (124 strokes)2.0% per year (100 strokes)HR 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.09)0.13
Intracranial hemorrhage (as recurrent stroke)Secondary0.25% per year (13 events)0.42% per year (21 events)HR 1.65 (95% CI, 0.83 to 3.31)0.15
Disabling or fatal strokeSecondary0.78% per year (40 events)0.84% per year (42 events)HR 1.06 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.64)0.79
Transient ischemic attack without strokeSecondary0.78% per year (39 events)0.57% per year (28 events)HR 0.73 (95% CI, 0.45 to 1.18)0.19
Myocardial infarctionSecondary0.71% per year (38 events)0.59% per year (31 events)HR 0.84 (95% CI, 0.52 to 1.35)0.47
Other thromboembolic events (VTE, peripheral arterial embolism)Secondary0.22% per year (12 events)0.40% per year (21 events)HR 1.81 (95% CI, 0.89 to 3.68)0.10
Major vascular event (stroke, MI, or vascular death)Secondary3.4% per year (174 events)3.1% per year (153 events)HR 0.89 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.11)0.29
Major extracranial hemorrhage (primary safety outcome)Adverse0.79% per year (42 events)1.7% per year (87 events)HR 2.15 (95% CI, 1.49 to 3.11)<0.001
All major hemorrhagesAdverse1.1% per year (56 events)2.1% per year (105 events)HR 1.97 (95% CI, 1.41 to 2.71)<0.001
Intracranial hemorrhage (safety)Adverse0.28% per year (15 events)0.42% per year (22 events)HR 1.52 (95% CI, 0.79 to 2.93)0.21
Gastrointestinal hemorrhageAdverse0.52% per year (28 events)1.1% per year (58 events)HR 2.14 (95% CI, 1.36 to 3.36)<0.001
All deathsAdverse1.4% per year (77 deaths)2.1% per year (113 deaths)HR 1.52 (95% CI, 1.14 to 2.04)0.004
Fatal hemorrhagesAdverse0.07% per year (4 events)0.17% per year (9 events)HR 2.29 (95% CI, 0.70 to 7.42)0.17

Criticisms

  • The sample-size calculation assumed a 3-year recurrent-stroke rate of 21% with a 25% relative reduction from DAPT (initial n=2500, upsized midway to 3000 with a 1-year follow-up extension). Observed rates were much lower (2.7%/yr in aspirin-only), so the trial may have been underpowered to detect a modest DAPT benefit.
  • All-cause mortality significantly increased with DAPT (HR 1.52, P=0.004) but was NOT fully explained by fatal hemorrhages (HR 2.29, P=0.17) — the unexplained excess deaths raise concern about occult harm from chronic DAPT in this population.
  • Aspirin dose of 325 mg was higher than the 75–100 mg used in CHANCE, POINT, and most modern DAPT regimens; critics argue higher aspirin may have increased bleeding, although the authors cite data suggesting aspirin dose did not modify efficacy of aspirin+clopidogrel in other populations.
  • Enrolled patients up to 180 days after the qualifying event — much later than CHANCE (24 h) or POINT (12 h). The acute short-course DAPT benefit seen in those trials may not apply to chronic long-term use, making SPS3 not directly comparable.
  • Early termination by DSMB for futility with harm — while ethically necessary, it limited power for secondary endpoints and subgroup analyses.
  • No MRI assessment of cerebral microbleeds at baseline — microbleed burden may modify bleeding risk from DAPT in SVD but was not captured in the trial.
  • Latin American / Hispanic enrollment (31%) may limit generalizability; CYP2C19 polymorphisms affecting clopidogrel metabolism vary across ethnic groups.
  • No comparison of aspirin monotherapy vs. clopidogrel monotherapy — SPS3 only tested adding clopidogrel to aspirin, leaving open whether clopidogrel alone would differ from aspirin alone for lacunar stroke.

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS; U01 NS38529-04A1) and others. Clopidogrel and matching placebo were donated by Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb; neither company had involvement in trial design, execution, analysis, or reporting.

Based on: SPS3 (The New England Journal of Medicine, 2012)

Authors: The SPS3 Investigators

Citation: N Engl J Med 2012;367:817-25.

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.