SPS3
Effects of Clopidogrel Added to Aspirin in Patients with Recent Lacunar Stroke
Clinical Question
In patients with recent symptomatic MRI-confirmed lacunar stroke, does adding clopidogrel to aspirin reduce the risk of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin alone?
Study Overview
Objective
To determine whether dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin + clopidogrel) and lower systolic blood pressure targets reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with recent lacunar stroke.
Study Summary
- Dual antiplatelet therapy increased the risk of major bleeding and mortality without reducing recurrent stroke compared to aspirin alone.
- Lower blood pressure target showed a non-significant trend toward reduced stroke risk.
Intervention
2x2 factorial design: (1) Aspirin + clopidogrel vs. aspirin alone; and (2) systolic blood pressure target <130 mm Hg vs. 130–149 mm Hg in patients with MRI-confirmed recent lacunar stroke.
Patients per Arm
Antiplatelet: 1503 dual vs. 1516 aspirin alone; BP: 1491 lower target vs. 1528 higher target.
Bottom Line
Among patients with recent MRI-confirmed lacunar strokes, adding clopidogrel to aspirin did not significantly reduce recurrent stroke but significantly increased major bleeding and all-cause mortality, and the antiplatelet arm was stopped early for harm. These findings do not support dual antiplatelet therapy for long-term secondary prevention in this population. The blood-pressure-target component of the trial was ongoing at time of this publication.
Major Points
- Largest randomized trial of secondary prevention specifically in MRI-confirmed lacunar stroke. 2×2 factorial design testing: (1) aspirin + clopidogrel vs. aspirin alone (antiplatelet arm, reported here), and (2) intensive vs. standard SBP target (BP-target arm was ongoing at publication; results anticipated in 2012).
- 3,020 patients with MRI-confirmed lacunar stroke (subcortical infarct ≤2.0 cm) within the preceding 180 days, with randomization at least 2 weeks after the qualifying stroke to avoid acute BP lowering. Enrolled at 82 centers across North America, Latin America, and Spain.
- Antiplatelet arm: Primary outcome (any recurrent stroke) not reduced with DAPT — 2.5%/yr vs. 2.7%/yr (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72–1.16, P=0.48).
- DAPT harm: major hemorrhage nearly doubled (2.1 vs. 1.1%/yr; HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.41–2.71, P<0.001). All-cause mortality significantly increased (2.1 vs. 1.4%/yr; HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.14–2.04, P=0.004). Antiplatelet arm stopped early by DSMB for futility with evidence of harm.
- Recurrent ischemic stroke was numerically but non-significantly reduced with DAPT (2.0 vs. 2.4%/yr; HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.63–1.09), offset by a non-significant increase in intracranial hemorrhage (0.42 vs. 0.25%/yr; HR 1.65, 95% CI 0.83–3.31).
- Key conclusion: DAPT is harmful for long-term secondary prevention after lacunar stroke — in contrast to the short-course benefit seen in acute minor stroke/TIA in CHANCE and POINT (DAPT used for ~21 days).
- Aspirin dose was 325 mg — higher than the 75–100 mg typically used in combination with clopidogrel in CHANCE/POINT and most modern DAPT regimens.
- No significant interaction between the antiplatelet and BP-target randomizations for the primary outcome (P=0.46 for interaction), supporting independent evaluation of the two components of the 2×2 factorial design.
- MRI confirmation of lacunar infarct ≤2.0 cm was required for enrollment — one of the strictest imaging-verified small-vessel-disease populations studied, distinguishing SPS3 from trials relying on clinical lacunar syndromes alone.
- Excess mortality with DAPT (HR 1.52, P=0.004) was NOT fully explained by fatal hemorrhages (HR 2.29, P=0.17) — raising concern about unexplained DAPT toxicity in this population, possibly related to underlying small-vessel disease.
Design
Study Type: Double-blind (antiplatelet component), multicenter, randomized trial with a 2×2 factorial design.
Randomization: 1
Blinding: Antiplatelet component: double-blind. Blood-pressure-target component: open-label (patients and practitioners aware of BP assignment).
Enrollment Period: 2003 to 2011.
Follow-up Duration: Mean of 3.4 years (range 0 to 8.2).
Centers: 82
Countries: North America, Latin America, Spain
Sample Size: 3020
Analysis: Intention-to-treat.
Inclusion Criteria
- Age ≥30 years.
- Symptomatic lacunar stroke within the preceding 180 days, with randomization occurring at least 2 weeks after the qualifying stroke.
- MRI confirmation: lesion ≤2.0 cm in diameter on diffusion-weighted imaging with corresponding positive apparent-diffusion-coefficient image, or well-delineated area of focal hyperintensity ≤2.0 cm on FLAIR or T2-weighted imaging, in a location consistent with a lacunar syndrome (internal capsule, thalamus, basal ganglia, pons, corona radiata, or centrum semiovale).
- Clinical presentation consistent with a lacunar syndrome (pure motor hemiparesis, pure sensory stroke, sensorimotor stroke, ataxic hemiparesis, or dysarthria-clumsy hand); transient lacunar ischemic attacks required diffusion-weighted MRI evidence.
- Modified Rankin Scale <4 (non-disabling).
Exclusion Criteria
- Disabling stroke (modified Rankin score ≥4).
- Previous nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage or previous cortical ischemic stroke.
- Surgically amenable ipsilateral carotid artery disease (paper does not specify a stenosis threshold).
- Major-risk cardioembolic source (per protocol; specific list not enumerated in the primary paper).
- MRI evidence of a recent or remote cortical infarct, or a large subcortical infarct (>1.5 cm).
Baseline Characteristics
| Characteristic | Control | Active |
|---|---|---|
| Mean age (yr) | 63 | 63 |
| Male sex (%) | 64 | 62 |
| Race or ethnic group (White) (%) | 52 | 52 |
| Race or ethnic group (Hispanic) (%) | 31 | 31 |
| Race or ethnic group (Black) (%) | 17 | 17 |
| History of hypertension (%) | 74 | 76 |
| Mean blood pressure at screening (mm Hg) | 143/78 | 143/78 |
| Diabetes (%) | 38 | 35 |
| Ischemic heart disease (%) | 11 | 10 |
| Previous clinical stroke or TIA (%) | 15 | 15 |
| Current tobacco smoker (%) | 21 | 20 |
| Use of aspirin at time of qualifying event (%) | 28 | 28 |
| Use of statin at any follow-up visit (%) | 85 | 84 |
Arms
| Field | Control | Aspirin plus Clopidogrel |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | 325 mg of enteric-coated aspirin daily plus a matching placebo for clopidogrel. | 325 mg of enteric-coated aspirin daily plus 75 mg of clopidogrel daily. |
| Duration | Mean of 3.4 years | Mean of 3.4 years |
Outcomes
| Outcome | Type | Control | Intervention | HR / OR / RR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any recurrent stroke, including ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (including subdural hematomas). | Primary | 2.7% per year (138 strokes) | 2.5% per year (125 strokes) | 0.92 | 0.48 |
| Ischemic stroke | Secondary | 2.4% per year (124 strokes) | 2.0% per year (100 strokes) | HR 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.09) | 0.13 |
| Intracranial hemorrhage (as recurrent stroke) | Secondary | 0.25% per year (13 events) | 0.42% per year (21 events) | HR 1.65 (95% CI, 0.83 to 3.31) | 0.15 |
| Disabling or fatal stroke | Secondary | 0.78% per year (40 events) | 0.84% per year (42 events) | HR 1.06 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.64) | 0.79 |
| Transient ischemic attack without stroke | Secondary | 0.78% per year (39 events) | 0.57% per year (28 events) | HR 0.73 (95% CI, 0.45 to 1.18) | 0.19 |
| Myocardial infarction | Secondary | 0.71% per year (38 events) | 0.59% per year (31 events) | HR 0.84 (95% CI, 0.52 to 1.35) | 0.47 |
| Other thromboembolic events (VTE, peripheral arterial embolism) | Secondary | 0.22% per year (12 events) | 0.40% per year (21 events) | HR 1.81 (95% CI, 0.89 to 3.68) | 0.10 |
| Major vascular event (stroke, MI, or vascular death) | Secondary | 3.4% per year (174 events) | 3.1% per year (153 events) | HR 0.89 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.11) | 0.29 |
| Major extracranial hemorrhage (primary safety outcome) | Adverse | 0.79% per year (42 events) | 1.7% per year (87 events) | HR 2.15 (95% CI, 1.49 to 3.11) | <0.001 |
| All major hemorrhages | Adverse | 1.1% per year (56 events) | 2.1% per year (105 events) | HR 1.97 (95% CI, 1.41 to 2.71) | <0.001 |
| Intracranial hemorrhage (safety) | Adverse | 0.28% per year (15 events) | 0.42% per year (22 events) | HR 1.52 (95% CI, 0.79 to 2.93) | 0.21 |
| Gastrointestinal hemorrhage | Adverse | 0.52% per year (28 events) | 1.1% per year (58 events) | HR 2.14 (95% CI, 1.36 to 3.36) | <0.001 |
| All deaths | Adverse | 1.4% per year (77 deaths) | 2.1% per year (113 deaths) | HR 1.52 (95% CI, 1.14 to 2.04) | 0.004 |
| Fatal hemorrhages | Adverse | 0.07% per year (4 events) | 0.17% per year (9 events) | HR 2.29 (95% CI, 0.70 to 7.42) | 0.17 |
Criticisms
- The sample-size calculation assumed a 3-year recurrent-stroke rate of 21% with a 25% relative reduction from DAPT (initial n=2500, upsized midway to 3000 with a 1-year follow-up extension). Observed rates were much lower (2.7%/yr in aspirin-only), so the trial may have been underpowered to detect a modest DAPT benefit.
- All-cause mortality significantly increased with DAPT (HR 1.52, P=0.004) but was NOT fully explained by fatal hemorrhages (HR 2.29, P=0.17) — the unexplained excess deaths raise concern about occult harm from chronic DAPT in this population.
- Aspirin dose of 325 mg was higher than the 75–100 mg used in CHANCE, POINT, and most modern DAPT regimens; critics argue higher aspirin may have increased bleeding, although the authors cite data suggesting aspirin dose did not modify efficacy of aspirin+clopidogrel in other populations.
- Enrolled patients up to 180 days after the qualifying event — much later than CHANCE (24 h) or POINT (12 h). The acute short-course DAPT benefit seen in those trials may not apply to chronic long-term use, making SPS3 not directly comparable.
- Early termination by DSMB for futility with harm — while ethically necessary, it limited power for secondary endpoints and subgroup analyses.
- No MRI assessment of cerebral microbleeds at baseline — microbleed burden may modify bleeding risk from DAPT in SVD but was not captured in the trial.
- Latin American / Hispanic enrollment (31%) may limit generalizability; CYP2C19 polymorphisms affecting clopidogrel metabolism vary across ethnic groups.
- No comparison of aspirin monotherapy vs. clopidogrel monotherapy — SPS3 only tested adding clopidogrel to aspirin, leaving open whether clopidogrel alone would differ from aspirin alone for lacunar stroke.
Funding
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS; U01 NS38529-04A1) and others. Clopidogrel and matching placebo were donated by Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb; neither company had involvement in trial design, execution, analysis, or reporting.
Based on: SPS3 (The New England Journal of Medicine, 2012)
Authors: The SPS3 Investigators
Citation: N Engl J Med 2012;367:817-25.
Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.