INSPIRES
(2023)Objective
Dual anti-platelet therapy (clopidogrel and aspirin) initiated within 72 hours versus aspirin alone in patients with mild ischemic stroke or high risk TIA presumably caused by atherosclerosis
Study Summary
Intervention
Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, within 72 hours after symptom onset to receive clopidogrel (300 mg on day 1 and 75 mg daily on days 2 to 90) plus aspirin (100 to 300 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily on days 2 to 21) or matching clopidogrel placebo plus aspirin (100 to 300 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily on days 2 to 90).
Inclusion Criteria
Patients were eligible if they were 35 to 80 years of age and had had an ischemic stroke with an NIHSS score of 5 or less or a high-risk TIA with a score of 4 or higher on the ABCD scale (which estimates the risk of stroke on the basis of age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of TIA, and the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus; range, 0 to 7, with higher scores indicating higher stroke risk) within 24 to 72 hours after symptom onset or had had an ischemic stroke (NIHSS score, 4 or 5) within 24 hours after symptom onset. Patients had to meet at least one of the following imaging criteria: at least 50% stenosis of a major intracranial or extracranial artery, as confirmed by carotid duplex ultrasonography or vascular imaging, that was likely to have accounted for the clinical presentation and cerebral infarction; or acute new multiple infarctions documented by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the head (excluding previous infarcts) of presumed large-artery atherosclerosis origin, including those with nonstenotic unstable plaque ipsilateral to the infarction.
Study Design
Arms: Clopidogrel plus aspirin vs. aspirin
Patients per Arm: Clopidogrel-aspirin: 3050, Aspirin: 3050
Outcome
Bottom Line
DAPT with clopidogrel + aspirin within 72h reduced 90-day stroke by 21% compared with aspirin alone (7.3% vs 9.2%; HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94; P=0.008) in atherosclerotic stroke/TIA. However, moderate-to-severe bleeding was doubled (0.9% vs 0.4%; HR 2.08; P=0.03). This extends the CHANCE/POINT benefit to a 72-hour window in an imaging-confirmed atherosclerotic population.
Major Points
- DAPT within 72h reduced stroke: 7.3% vs 9.2% (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94; P=0.008) — 21% relative risk reduction.
- Extends CHANCE/POINT time window: 87.2% of patients were randomized >24h; greatest benefit in 48-72h subgroup (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53-0.93).
- Atherosclerotic imaging criteria required: 82% had ≥50% symptomatic stenosis; 67.6% had multiple acute infarctions.
- Benefit concentrated in multiple infarction subgroup: HR 0.74 (0.61-0.90). TIA-only and single infarction subgroups showed no benefit (HR ~1.0).
- Bleeding cost is real: moderate-to-severe 0.9% vs 0.4% (HR 2.08; P=0.03); hemorrhagic stroke 0.5% vs 0.2% (HR 3.01; 95% CI 1.09-8.28).
- Functional outcome improved: poor outcome (mRS 2-6) 9.9% vs 11.4% (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.76-0.99).
- Ischemic stroke specifically reduced: 6.8% vs 9.0% (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.63-0.90).
- Two-by-two factorial design with statin component (not reported in this publication).
- Absolute benefit smaller than CHANCE (~2pp vs ~3.5pp) — likely from later treatment window.
- 6,100 patients, 222 Chinese hospitals, double-blind placebo-controlled.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind with matching placebos for both drugs. Block size 8, stratified by center.
- Sample Size
- 6100
- Follow-up
- 90 days (randomized) + 9 months additional for adverse events
- Centers
- 222
- Countries
- China
Primary Outcome
Definition: Any new stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) within 90 days
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 279/3,050 (9.2%) | 222/3,050 (7.3%) | 0.79 (0.66-0.94) | 0.008 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- 98.5% Han Chinese — generalizability uncertain for other ethnicities.
- Excluded cardioembolic, moderate-severe stroke, thrombolysis/thrombectomy patients.
- Smaller absolute benefit than CHANCE (~2pp vs ~3.5pp) due to later window.
- More bleeding than prior DAPT trials: moderate-severe 0.9% vs 0.4%.
- CYP2C19 genotype not assessed despite known effects on clopidogrel efficacy.
- Protocol amendment mid-trial excluding NIHSS ≤3/TIA within 24h.
- Secondary outcomes not adjusted for multiplicity.
Citation
N Engl J Med 2023;389:2413-24.