ROADSTER 2 Early Outcomes
(2020)Objective
Early outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) performed by physicians with variable experience.
Study Summary
Intervention
ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent and Neuroprotection System with reversal of flow cerebral protection vs. historical controls.
Inclusion Criteria
High-risk patients for CEA with symptomatic stenosis ≥50% or asymptomatic stenosis ≥80%, at least one high-risk factor, adequate common carotid anatomy.
Study Design
Arms: TCAR with ENROUTE System vs. Historical Controls
Patients per Arm: 632 patients in per-protocol analysis (692 total intention-to-treat)
Outcome
Bottom Line
TCAR with the ENROUTE system demonstrates excellent early outcomes with high technical success (99.7%) and low stroke (0.6% per-protocol) and death rates (0.2% per-protocol) in high-risk patients, achieved by a majority of operators new to this technology.
Major Points
- ROADSTER 2 is a prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter post-approval registry
- 692 patients enrolled at 43 sites; 632 in per-protocol analysis
- 81.2% of operators were TCAR naïve before study initiation
- 26% had neurological symptoms; all patients had high-risk factors for CEA
- Technical success: 99.7% in both ITT and per-protocol populations
- Per-protocol outcomes: 0.6% stroke, 0.2% death, 0.9% MI
- ITT outcomes: 1.9% stroke, 0.4% death, 0.9% MI
- Composite 30-day stroke/death rate: 0.8% (per-protocol), 2.3% (ITT)
- Procedural success rate: 97.9% (per-protocol), 96.5% (ITT)
- Protocol adherence critical for optimal outcomes
Study Design
- Study Type
- Prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, post-approval registry
- Randomization
- No
- Blinding
- Open-label design
- Sample Size
- 632
- Follow-up
- 30 days
- Centers
- 43
- Countries
- United States, European Union
Primary Outcome
Definition: Procedural success (technical success plus absence of stroke, MI, or death within 30 days)
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 97.9% (PP), 96.5% (ITT) | - |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Single-arm design without randomized control group
- 60 patients had major protocol violations (medication non-compliance)
- Only early 30-day outcomes reported
- Learning curve effects possible despite training
- Selection bias inherent in registry design
- No direct comparison to CEA in same time period
- Majority of operators were TCAR naïve, limiting generalizability
Citation
Stroke. 2020;51:2620–2629