ROADSTER 2
One-year outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) in the ROADSTER 2 trial
Clinical Question
What are the 1-year safety and efficacy outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) using the ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent System in high-risk patients?
Bottom Line
TCAR with the ENROUTE system demonstrates excellent 1-year safety with 0% ipsilateral stroke rate and low mortality (2.6%) in high-risk patients, supporting its use as a safe alternative to CEA in this population.
Major Points
- ROADSTER 2 LTFU was a prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter post-approval registry
- 155 patients from 21 centers with 1-year follow-up (subset of 632 total ROADSTER 2 enrollment)
- 77% asymptomatic, 23% symptomatic patients, all high-risk for CEA
- Primary endpoint: 0% ipsilateral stroke at 1 year (0/155 patients)
- Overall mortality: 2.6% (4/155), all from non-neurological causes
- Technical success rate: 98.7%
- Cranial nerve injury rate: 1.3% (2/155)
- No perioperative myocardial infarctions occurred
- Composite stroke/death rate: 2.6%
- Results demonstrate superior outcomes compared to transfemoral carotid stenting trials
Design
Study Type: Prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, post-approval registry
Randomization:
Blinding: Open-label, no blinding
Enrollment Period: June 2016 - November 2018
Follow-up Duration: 1 year (365 days)
Centers: 21
Countries: United States, European Union
Sample Size: 155
Analysis: Per-protocol analysis with descriptive statistics and Fisher exact test for categorical variables
Inclusion Criteria
- Participation in ROADSTER 2 parent trial
- High risk for CEA complications
- Completion of 30-day follow-up visit
- Consent for 1-year clinical follow-up visit
- Age >18 years
- Treatment with ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent and Neuroprotection System
Exclusion Criteria
- Major protocol deviations in parent trial
- Inclusion/exclusion criteria violations
- Medication noncompliance
- Failure to complete required follow-up visits
Baseline Characteristics
| Characteristic | Control | Active |
|---|---|---|
| Total Patients | 155 | |
| Male | 70% | |
| Female | 30% | |
| Caucasian | 89% | |
| Age ≥80 | 23% | |
| Hypertension | 89% | |
| Hyperlipidemia | 82% | |
| Diabetes | 32% | |
| Smoking History | 73% | |
| Previous MI | 17% | |
| Symptomatic | 23% | |
| Asymptomatic | 77% | |
| Anatomic High-Risk Only | 43% | |
| Physiologic High-Risk Only | 32% | |
| Both Anatomic and Physiologic | 25% | |
| High Lesion Location | 26% | |
| Age ≥75 years | 44% |
Arms
| Field | TCAR with ENROUTE System |
|---|---|
| Intervention | Transcarotid artery revascularization using ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent and Neuroprotection System with dynamic flow reversal |
| Duration | Single procedure with 1-year follow-up |
Outcomes
| Outcome | Type | Control | Intervention | HR / OR / RR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidence of ipsilateral stroke at 1 year after treatment | Primary | 0% (0/155) | |||
| Death at 1 year | Secondary | 2.6% (4/155) | |||
| Neurological death | Secondary | 0% (0/155) | |||
| Non-neurological death | Secondary | 2.6% (4/155) | |||
| Composite stroke/death | Secondary | 2.6% (4/155) | |||
| Technical success | Secondary | 98.7% (153/155) | |||
| Perioperative myocardial infarction | Secondary | 0% (0/155) | |||
| Cranial nerve injury | Adverse | 1.3% (2/155) | |||
| Device-related adverse events | Adverse | 1.3% (2/155 - carotid artery dissections) |
Subgroup Analysis
Symptomatic patients: 1 death (2.8%), 0 strokes. Asymptomatic patients: 3 deaths (2.5%), 0 strokes. All deaths were non-neurological.
Criticisms
- Single-arm design without randomized control group
- Subset analysis of larger parent trial (155 of 632 patients)
- Potential selection bias - only patients consenting to long-term follow-up included
- 11 patients excluded due to protocol deviations
- Limited follow-up duration (1 year)
- Investigators had prior TCAR experience, limiting generalizability to learning curve
- No comparison to CEA in same time period
Funding
Funded by Silk Road Medical Inc
Based on: ROADSTER 2 (Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2022)
Authors: Vikram S. Kashyap, Kristine L. So, Peter A. Schneider, ..., James G. Melton
Citation: J Vasc Surg 2022;76:466-73
Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.