LAACS
(2022)Objective
To examine if routine closure of the left atrial appendage in patients undergoing open-heart surgery provides long-term protection against cerebrovascular events independently of atrial fibrillation history, stroke risk, and oral anticoagulation use
Study Summary
• Protective effect was independent of pre-surgery atrial fibrillation status and stroke risk
• No increase in mortality or safety concerns with LAA closure
Intervention
Surgical left atrial appendage closure added to elective open-heart surgery
Inclusion Criteria
Patients undergoing elective first-time open-heart surgery
Study Design
Arms: LAA closure group vs standard care (open LAA)
Patients per Arm: 100 vs 86
Outcome
• Clinical stroke/TIA events: 10.0% vs 15.1% (P = 0.252)
• All-cause mortality: 23.0% vs 27.9% (P = 0.401)
Bottom Line
Left atrial appendage closure during open-heart surgery significantly reduced cerebrovascular events by 53% over long-term follow-up, regardless of pre-surgery atrial fibrillation status or stroke risk, with no increase in mortality.
Major Points
- First randomized trial to investigate routine LAA closure in patients with and without atrial fibrillation
- 53% reduction in primary composite endpoint (stroke, TIA, silent cerebral ischemic lesions)
- Protective effect independent of baseline AF status and CHA2DS2-VASc score
- No increase in mortality or perioperative complications
- Mean follow-up of 6.2 years with up to 10 years observation
- Double closure technique recommended with purse string and running suture
Study Design
- Study Type
- Prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded evaluation trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Two neurologists blinded for treatment assignment adjudicated cerebrovascular events
- Sample Size
- 186
- Follow-up
- Mean 6.2 years (up to 10 years)
- Centers
- 2
- Countries
- Denmark
Primary Outcome
Definition: Composite endpoint of ischemic stroke events, transient ischemic attacks, and imaging findings of silent cerebral ischemic lesions
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22.1% (19/86) | 11.0% (11/100) | 0.46 (0.22-0.98) | 0.033 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Moderate sample size with many cross-over cases at single center
- Many protocol deviations potentially diminishing randomization effect
- Study included patients undergoing various types of surgery with different baseline characteristics
- Closure method not always documented in detail in patient files
- Additional study-specific long-term follow-up cerebral imaging not performed
- Primary outcome included both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke which may confound results
- Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation procedures during follow-up not registered
Citation
Semin Thoracic Surg 35:664–672 © 2022