LAACS with cardiac surgery
(2018)Objective
To investigate whether left atrial appendage closure with surgery (LAACS) in addition to open heart surgery protects against post-operative ischemic brain injury regardless of atrial fibrillation history
Study Summary
• Protection was independent of baseline atrial fibrillation status or anticoagulation use
• Most events in control group occurred beyond first year of follow-up
Intervention
Concomitant left atrial appendage closure with surgery during elective open heart surgery
Inclusion Criteria
Consecutive patients undergoing planned first-time open-heart surgery (CABG, valve surgery or combination) within 40 km radius from hospital
Study Design
Arms: LAACS group (n=101) vs Standard care control group (n=86)
Patients per Arm: LAACS: 101, Control: 86
Outcome
• Clinical stroke alone: 3% LAACS vs 10% control (HR 0.3, p=0.08)
• No difference in all-cause mortality between groups
Bottom Line
LAACS during elective open-heart surgery was associated with a 70% reduction in post-operative ischemic brain events, with protection independent of baseline atrial fibrillation status.
Major Points
- First randomized study of LAACS in addition to first-time open-heart surgery
- 187 patients randomized, 141 followed treatment protocol
- Primary endpoint was composite of stroke, TIA, or silent cerebral ischemia
- Mean follow-up of 3.7 years (up to 6 years)
- Significant reduction in primary events: 5% LAACS vs 16% control
- Effect was independent of baseline AF status, anticoagulation use, or CHA2DS2-VASc score
- Most events in control group occurred beyond first year
- No adverse events from LAACS procedure recorded
Study Design
- Study Type
- Prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Radiologists were blinded to randomization for MRI analysis
- Sample Size
- 187
- Follow-up
- Mean 3.7 ± 1.6 years (up to 6 years)
- Centers
- 1
- Countries
- Denmark
Primary Outcome
Definition: Composite of post-operative symptomatic ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack or imaging findings of silent cerebral ischemic lesions
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 (16%) | 5 (5%) | 0.3 (0.1-0.8) | 0.02 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Study halted before reaching planned sample size of 200 patients due to competing studies
- Substantial cross-over rate (46 patients did not follow treatment protocol)
- Only 40% of patients underwent both planned brain MRIs due to patient frailty and discomfort
- Only 10 patients from LAACS group underwent TEE to confirm closure
- Study not powered specifically to demonstrate stroke protection
- Inclusion of silent cerebral ischemia in primary endpoint may be indirect measure
- Open-label design without blinding of treatment allocation
Citation
Park-Hansen et al. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery (2018) 13:53