← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

Emergent Stenting After IVT

Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting Plus Thrombectomy After Thrombolysis in Tandem Strokes: Analysis of the TITAN Registry

Year of Publication: 2019

Authors: Mohammad Anadani, Alejandro M. Spiotta, Ali Alawieh, ..., Benjamin Gory

Journal: Stroke

Citation: Stroke. 2019;50:2250-2252. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024733

Link: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024733


Clinical Question

Does prior IV thrombolysis increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing emergent carotid artery stenting and thrombectomy for tandem occlusions?

Bottom Line

In the TITAN registry (205 patients with atherosclerotic tandem occlusions treated with CAS-MT), prior IV thrombolysis did not increase hemorrhagic risk. sICH: 5% (IVT) vs 8% (no-IVT; P=0.544). PH1-2: 15% vs 18% (P=0.647). Functional independence (mRS 0-2): 62% vs 51% (P=0.145). Unadjusted mortality was lower with IVT (8% vs 20%; P=0.017) but not significant after multivariate adjustment.

Major Points

  • IVT before CAS-MT does not increase sICH: 5% vs 8% (P=0.544). Not associated on multivariate analysis.
  • Parenchymal hematoma similar: 15% vs 18% (P=0.647).
  • Reperfusion equivalent: mTICI 2b-3 in 82% vs 80% (P=0.856).
  • Functional outcome similar: mRS 0-2 62% vs 51% (P=0.145).
  • Unadjusted mortality lower with IVT (8% vs 20%; P=0.017) — lost on multivariate adjustment (confounded by longer onset-to-groin in no-IVT).
  • Procedural complications equivalent: 12% vs 11%.
  • Heparin used less with IVT (14% vs 35%; P<0.001) — operators avoided additional anticoagulation.
  • Overall sICH 5.9% — consistent with meta-analysis benchmarks for tandem thrombectomy.
  • 205 patients, international multicenter retrospective registry (TITAN). Stryker-funded.
  • Supports bridging IVT before CAS-MT in tandem occlusions when indicated.

Design

Study Type: Multicenter, retrospective, observational registry study

Randomization:

Blinding: No blinding; adjudication of outcomes based on standardized criteria

Enrollment Period: January 2012 – September 2016

Follow-up Duration: 90 days

Centers: 20

Countries: United States, France, Germany, Spain, Netherlands

Sample Size: 205

Analysis: Univariate and multivariate regression; chi-square and t-test comparisons between IVT and no-IVT groups


Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults with acute ischemic stroke due to atherosclerotic tandem occlusion
  • Received emergent carotid artery stenting and mechanical thrombectomy
  • Known IVT status

Exclusion Criteria

  • Non-atherosclerotic cause of occlusion
  • Incomplete procedural data
  • Unknown IVT status

Arms

FieldIVT + CAS-MTControl
InterventionIntravenous thrombolysis followed by carotid artery stenting and mechanical thrombectomyCarotid artery stenting and mechanical thrombectomy without prior IVT
DurationAcute interventionAcute intervention

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 24hPrimary8%5%3.00%0.544
90-day mortality | NNT: 8Secondary20%8%0.017
Favorable outcome (mRS 0–2 at 90 days)Secondary51%62%0.145
Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b–3)Secondary80%82%0.856
Parenchymal hematoma (PH 1–2)Adverse15% (IVT) vs 18% (no-IVT), P=0.647
Procedural complicationsAdverse12% (IVT) vs 11% (no-IVT), P=0.999

Subgroup Analysis

Multivariate models showed no association between IVT and sICH, mortality, or functional outcome after adjustment


Criticisms

  • Retrospective and observational design limits causal inference
  • Heterogeneous antiplatelet protocols across sites
  • Only periprocedural antithrombotic data collected
  • Possible selection bias in IVT administration
  • Small sample size for safety endpoints

Funding

Stryker

Based on: Emergent Stenting After IVT (Stroke, 2019)

Authors: Mohammad Anadani, Alejandro M. Spiotta, Ali Alawieh, ..., Benjamin Gory

Citation: Stroke. 2019;50:2250-2252. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024733

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.