← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

DISTALS

DISTALS

Year of Publication: 2025

Authors: Rishi Gupta, Jeffrey Saver

Journal: Not published yet

Citation: Presented at International Stroke Conference (ISC) 2026

Link: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2408954


Clinical Question

Does thrombectomy with the Tigertriever 13 device improve 24-hour reperfusion compared to medical management alone in MeVO/DVO stroke patients ineligible for IVT?

Bottom Line

Tigertriever 13 thrombectomy achieved dramatically higher rates of successful reperfusion without sICH at 24 hours compared to medical management (86.3% vs 27.7%) in MeVO/DVO stroke patients not eligible for IVT, with no device-related sICH. Clinical 90-day outcomes are pending.

Major Points

  • Primary endpoint met: successful reperfusion without sICH at 24 hours was 86.3% with Tigertriever 13 vs 27.7% with medical management (P<0.001).
  • 0% sICH in patients treated with Tigertriever 13; the single sICH in the thrombectomy arm occurred in a patient erroneously treated with the larger Tigertriever 17 device.
  • Trial enrolled exclusively MeVO/DVO patients ineligible for IVT — a distinctive population.
  • Primary endpoint was imaging-based (>50% reduction in substantial hypoperfusion volume at 24h without sICH), not a 90-day clinical outcome.
  • Onset-to-randomization time exceeded 7 hours for both arms — substantially longer than DISTAL, ESCAPE-MeVO, and DISCOUNT.
  • Higher rate of PCA occlusions compared to prior MeVO RCTs, with similar M2 rates.
  • Patient population was younger on average than prior MeVO trials.
  • No IVT or anticoagulant therapies were administered in enrolled patients.
  • Tigertriever 13 is designed specifically for distal/MeVO anatomy with low delivery profile, imaging visibility, and adjustable force reduction during retrieval.
  • 149 patients enrolled total, 118 randomized (51 thrombectomy, 47 medical management); discrepancy between enrollment and randomization not fully detailed.
  • Industry-sponsored trial (Rapid Medical); FDA IDE for Tigertriever 13 granted in 2021.
  • 90-day mRS and quality-of-life data forthcoming; Rapid Medical plans to pursue full FDA clearance.

Design

Study Type: Prospective, industry-sponsored, randomized controlled trial (IDE study)

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Open-label

Follow-up Duration: 24 hours (primary endpoint); 90 days (pending)

Countries: USA, Germany, Belgium, Sweden

Sample Size: 118

Analysis: Intention-to-treat


Inclusion Criteria

  • Ischemic stroke due to MeVO/DVO (co-dominant or non-dominant M2, M3, A1–A3, P1–P3)
  • NIHSS score 4–24, or NIHSS 2–24 if aphasia and/or hemianopia present
  • Ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis
  • Within 24 hours of last known well

Arms

FieldTigertriever 13 + Medical ManagementControl
InterventionThrombectomy using Tigertriever 13 stent retriever (Rapid Medical) plus standard medical managementStandard medical management alone (no IVT)
Duration

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Successful reperfusion defined as >50% reduction in substantial hypoperfusion volume between baseline and 24 hours post-randomization without symptomatic ICHPrimary27.7%86.3%58.60%P<0.001
90-day mRS distributionSecondaryPendingPending
Quality-of-life scores at 90 daysSecondaryPendingPending
Symptomatic ICH (Tigertriever 13)Adverse0%
Symptomatic ICH (thrombectomy arm including protocol deviation)Adverse1 event (patient erroneously treated with Tigertriever 17)

Subgroup Analysis

Not reported in initial ISC presentation.


Criticisms

  • Primary endpoint is imaging-based (24-hour reperfusion), not a 90-day clinical outcome — clinical benefit remains unproven until mRS data are available.
  • Very small sample size (51 vs 47 randomized) limits power for safety and subgroup analyses.
  • Open-label design with no blinding.
  • Industry-sponsored by Rapid Medical, the manufacturer of Tigertriever 13.
  • Exclusively enrolled patients ineligible for IVT, limiting generalizability to the broader MeVO population.
  • 149 enrolled but only 118 randomized — reasons for the discrepancy not fully detailed in the presentation.
  • No 90-day mRS or quality-of-life data yet available.
  • Device-specific trial (Tigertriever 13 only) — results may not generalize to other thrombectomy devices/techniques.
  • Onset-to-randomization >7 hours in both arms is substantially longer than prior MeVO RCTs, making the population distinct.
  • Baseline characteristics limited (conference presentation only; full manuscript pending).
  • Single sICH case attributed to protocol deviation (wrong device) — may understate true device-class risk.

Funding

Industry-sponsored (Rapid Medical)

Based on: DISTALS (Not published yet, 2025)

Authors: Rishi Gupta, Jeffrey Saver

Citation: Presented at International Stroke Conference (ISC) 2026

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.