Venous-TD
(2025)Objective
To assess the efficacy and safety of the dedicated Venous-TD device for cerebral venous thrombectomy compared to standard balloon-based thrombectomy.
Study Summary
Intervention
Endovascular thrombectomy using Venous-TD device vs. Angioguard with Sterling balloon. All patients received LMWH pre- and post-procedure, with optional local urokinase thrombolysis.
Inclusion Criteria
Adults aged 18–85 with acute or subacute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, eligible for EVT. Excluded isolated cortical or cavernous sinus thrombosis, pregnancy, or contraindications to anticoagulation or thrombolysis.
Study Design
Arms: Venous-TD vs. Angioguard + Balloon
Patients per Arm: Venous-TD: 31, Control: 30
Outcome
Bottom Line
This pilot randomized trial indicates that Venous-TD significantly increased the proportion of immediate and long-term complete recanalization and reduced severe residual headache at 180 days in cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT), without increasing complications, warranting a multicenter phase III trial.
Major Points
- A total of 61 patients with cerebral venous thrombosis were enrolled and randomized (31 to Venous-TD, 30 to control group: Angioguard with Sterling balloon).
- During EVT, Venous-TD significantly improved the proportion of immediate complete recanalization compared with Angioguard (23 [76.7%] vs 6 [20.0%]; relative risk [RR], 3.833 [95% CI, 1.825-8.054]).
- The operation duration in the Venous-TD group was significantly shorter (median, 30 min vs 151 min; P<0.001).
- Venous-TD significantly improved the proportion of long-term complete recanalization at 180 days (26 [83.9%] vs 10 [33.3%]; RR, 2.516 [95% CI, 1.482-4.271]).
- The proportion of patients with severe residual headache at 180 days in the Venous-TD group was significantly lower (3 [9.7%] vs 10 [35.7%]; RR, 0.271 [95% CI, 0.083-0.886]).
- The proportions of long-term functional independence at 180 days were not significantly different between the two groups (27 [87.1%] vs 24 [80.0%]; RR, 1.089 [95% CI, 0.870-1.363]).
- Safety outcomes (peri-procedural complications, all-cause mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
- No patients died during EVT or within 180 days in the Venous-TD group; 2 patients died in the control group within 90 days.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Pilot, prospective, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group control, single-center clinical study
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Single-blind (assessors of functional outcomes were blinded to treatment randomization). Patients and surgeons were not blinded.
- Sample Size
- 61
- Follow-up
- 180 days
- Centers
- 1
Primary Outcome
Definition: Proportion of immediate complete recanalization during EVT. Complete recanalization was defined as blood flow without any interruption.
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 (20.0%) | 23 (76.7%) | 3.833 (1.825-8.054) | - |
Limitations & Criticisms
- This is a pilot trial performed in a single center, which leads to inevitable bias and limits generalizability. A multicenter study is ongoing to address this.
- The control group used Angioguard with Sterling balloon, which is an arterial thrombectomy device used off-label for venous thrombectomy. This limits the comparability to standard medical care (full-dose anticoagulation) and warrants a control group treated by anticoagulation only in future studies.
- The primary outcome was recanalization, an anatomic outcome, rather than a functional outcome. A future study setting functional outcome as the primary outcome is needed.
- The small sample size (n=61) leads to important imbalances between the two treatment arms in baseline characteristics including age, onset-to-treatment time, focal deficits, ICH, etc.
- The site of the thrombus was slightly different between the two groups, which may have influenced the results.
- For outcomes during the operation, the assessors were the surgeons who were not blinded to the device, which is a main limitation of the trial and a source of potential bias.
- Early reocclusion after EVT, an important issue in CVT, was not investigated by early control venography.
Citation
Stroke. 2025:56:5-13. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.045607