Clinical Question
In children with Sickle Cell Disease (Hb SS) at high risk for stroke identified by TCD, does chronic blood transfusion therapy reduce the incidence of first-time stroke compared to standard care?
Bottom Line
Chronic blood transfusion therapy reduced stroke risk by 92% in high-risk children with sickle cell disease identified by TCD velocities ≥200 cm/s. The trial was stopped early due to overwhelming benefit and established TCD screening with prophylactic transfusion as standard of care.
Major Points
- STOP is the landmark trial establishing primary stroke prevention in sickle cell disease — the first demonstration that a screening test (TCD) could identify high-risk children and an intervention (transfusion) could prevent strokes before they occurred.
- 130 children (age 2–16) with HbSS or Sβ0-thalassemia and abnormal TCD (time-averaged mean velocity ≥200 cm/s in ICA or MCA) randomized at 14 US and Canadian centers.
- Stopped early by DSMB: 11 strokes in observation group vs 1 in transfusion group (92% risk reduction, p<0.001). The single stroke in the transfusion group occurred when transfusion was temporarily interrupted.
- TCD screening identified ~10% of screened children as high-risk (≥200 cm/s). Without transfusion, stroke rate was ~10%/year in this group — one of the highest stroke rates in any population.
- Transfusion target: reduce HbS to <30% with regular simple or exchange transfusions every 3–4 weeks. This became the standard protocol for primary stroke prevention in SCD worldwide.
- Established TCD as a standard screening tool — AHA/ASA guidelines now recommend annual TCD screening starting at age 2 for all children with HbSS or Sβ0-thalassemia (Class I, Level A evidence).
- Led directly to STOP II (2005), which showed that discontinuing transfusions after TCD normalization led to reversion to abnormal velocities in 39% and strokes — establishing that transfusion must be continued indefinitely.
- Raised critical questions about transfusion burden: iron overload requiring chelation therapy, alloimmunization risk, infection risk, and quality of life impact of lifelong transfusions.
- Hydroxyurea later emerged as an alternative in the TWiTCH trial (2016) for children with no MRA vasculopathy — but STOP transfusion remains standard for highest-risk patients.
- One of the most impactful pediatric neurology trials ever — transformed SCD stroke from a common devastating complication to a largely preventable disease when screening is implemented.
Design
Study Type: Prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center treatment trial.
Randomization: 1
Blinding: Blinded reading of TCDs and blinded adjudication of endpoints.
Enrollment Period: 18 months of TCD screening and randomization.
Follow-up Duration: Observation for stroke from entry through month 54.
Centers: Not specified
Countries:
Sample Size: 130
Analysis: Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
- Age, from 24 months to 16 years.
- Hemoglobinopathy diagnosis of Hb SS or Sβ⁰ thalassemia.
- Willingness and ability to be screened as evidenced by signed parental informed consent and child's assent.
- Availability for follow-up for at least 2 years.
Exclusion Criteria
- Prior stroke.
- An indication for chronic blood transfusion or a contraindication to chronic transfusion.
- Participation in any study involving treatments which might confound the interpretation of the results of the proposed work.
- Previous bone marrow transplant.
- Evidence of HIV infection.
- Generalized seizure disorder treated with anticonvulsant medication.
- Pregnancy.
Baseline Characteristics
| Characteristic | Control | Active |
|---|
Arms
| Field | Control | Chronic Transfusion Therapy |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Standard supportive care for sickle cell disease without prophylactic transfusion. Patients received usual clinical management including hydroxyurea if already prescribed, but no chronic transfusion program for stroke prevention. | Simple or exchange transfusions every 3–4 weeks, targeting HbS <30%. Initial transfusion to raise hemoglobin and reduce HbS fraction, then maintenance transfusions. Iron chelation with deferoxamine initiated when ferritin exceeded thresholds. |
| Duration | Median follow-up ~21 months (trial stopped early). | Median follow-up ~21 months (trial stopped early). |
Outcomes
| Outcome | Type | Control | Intervention | HR / OR / RR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First cerebral infarction (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke) confirmed by clinical presentation and CT/MRI. | Primary | 11 strokes in 67 patients (16.4%) | 1 stroke in 63 patients (1.6%) | 14.80% | <0.001 |
| TCD velocity changes during follow-up | Secondary | Velocities remained elevated or increased | Significant reduction in TCD velocities with transfusion | ||
| Transient ischemic attacks | Secondary | Additional TIAs occurred in observation group | No TIAs in transfusion group | ||
| Iron overload | Adverse | N/A | Expected complication requiring chelation therapy with deferoxamine | ||
| Alloimmunization | Adverse | N/A | Transfusion-related antibody formation occurred in a subset of transfused patients |
Criticisms
- Small sample size (130 patients) — while the 92% risk reduction was overwhelming, the trial was underpowered for subgroup analyses and rare adverse events.
- Open-label design — families and clinicians knew treatment allocation, potentially affecting reporting of neurological symptoms and threshold for imaging.
- US/Canada only enrollment — generalizability to African, Caribbean, and other populations with high SCD burden but different healthcare infrastructure is uncertain.
- No blinding of TCD operators — knowledge of treatment allocation could theoretically bias velocity measurements and endpoint adjudication.
- Does not address the DURATION of transfusion — STOP established that transfusion prevents stroke but did not define when/if it could be stopped (STOP II later showed it cannot).
- Iron overload burden not fully characterized — the lifelong transfusion commitment creates substantial iron chelation requirements, quality-of-life impact, and healthcare costs not captured in the trial.
- Does not address hydroxyurea as an alternative — the trial predated widespread hydroxyurea use in SCD, leaving the question of whether a less burdensome therapy could achieve similar results (later addressed by TWiTCH).
- TCD screening requires trained operators and standardized protocols — implementation in resource-limited settings where SCD is most prevalent remains challenging.
- Selection of ≥200 cm/s threshold — while validated, some children below this threshold still develop strokes, suggesting the screening misses a proportion of at-risk patients. Conditional (170–199 cm/s) velocities have uncertain management.
Funding
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Based on: STOP (The New England Journal of Medicine, 1998)
Authors: Robert J. Adams, MD, Virgil C. McKie, ..., and Myron A. Waclawiw
Citation: Adams RJ, et al. N Engl J Med 1998;339:5-11.
Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.