STOP
(1998)Objective
Evaluate whether regular blood transfusion in children with sickle cell anemia and abnormal TCD velocities can reduce the risk of first-time stroke.
Study Summary
Intervention
Randomized, multicenter trial. Children aged 2–16 years with HbSS or HbSβ0 thalassemia and abnormal TCD results were randomized to either chronic transfusion therapy (HbS <30%) or standard care. Follow-up continued for 30 months after randomization.
Study Design
Arms: Array
Outcome
• Relative risk reduction: ~90% (P<0.001)
• Stroke incidence: 0.9 per 100 patient-years (transfusion) vs. 10.7 per 100 patient-years (standard care)
• No significant increase in severe transfusion complications
• MRI-defined silent infarcts and iron overload were monitored as secondary outcomes
Bottom Line
Chronic blood transfusion therapy reduced stroke risk by 92% in high-risk children with sickle cell disease identified by TCD velocities ≥200 cm/s. The trial was stopped early due to overwhelming benefit and established TCD screening with prophylactic transfusion as standard of care.
Major Points
- STOP is the landmark trial establishing primary stroke prevention in sickle cell disease — the first demonstration that a screening test (TCD) could identify high-risk children and an intervention (transfusion) could prevent strokes before they occurred.
- 130 children (age 2–16) with HbSS or Sβ0-thalassemia and abnormal TCD (time-averaged mean velocity ≥200 cm/s in ICA or MCA) randomized at 14 US and Canadian centers.
- Stopped early by DSMB: 11 strokes in observation group vs 1 in transfusion group (92% risk reduction, p<0.001). The single stroke in the transfusion group occurred when transfusion was temporarily interrupted.
- TCD screening identified ~10% of screened children as high-risk (≥200 cm/s). Without transfusion, stroke rate was ~10%/year in this group — one of the highest stroke rates in any population.
- Transfusion target: reduce HbS to <30% with regular simple or exchange transfusions every 3–4 weeks. This became the standard protocol for primary stroke prevention in SCD worldwide.
- Established TCD as a standard screening tool — AHA/ASA guidelines now recommend annual TCD screening starting at age 2 for all children with HbSS or Sβ0-thalassemia (Class I, Level A evidence).
- Led directly to STOP II (2005), which showed that discontinuing transfusions after TCD normalization led to reversion to abnormal velocities in 39% and strokes — establishing that transfusion must be continued indefinitely.
- Raised critical questions about transfusion burden: iron overload requiring chelation therapy, alloimmunization risk, infection risk, and quality of life impact of lifelong transfusions.
- Hydroxyurea later emerged as an alternative in the TWiTCH trial (2016) for children with no MRA vasculopathy — but STOP transfusion remains standard for highest-risk patients.
- One of the most impactful pediatric neurology trials ever — transformed SCD stroke from a common devastating complication to a largely preventable disease when screening is implemented.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center treatment trial.
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Blinded reading of TCDs and blinded adjudication of endpoints.
- Sample Size
- 130
- Follow-up
- Observation for stroke from entry through month 54.
- Centers
- Not specified
Primary Outcome
Definition: First cerebral infarction (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke) confirmed by clinical presentation and CT/MRI.
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 strokes in 67 patients (16.4%) | 1 stroke in 63 patients (1.6%) | - | <0.001 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Small sample size (130 patients) — while the 92% risk reduction was overwhelming, the trial was underpowered for subgroup analyses and rare adverse events.
- Open-label design — families and clinicians knew treatment allocation, potentially affecting reporting of neurological symptoms and threshold for imaging.
- US/Canada only enrollment — generalizability to African, Caribbean, and other populations with high SCD burden but different healthcare infrastructure is uncertain.
- No blinding of TCD operators — knowledge of treatment allocation could theoretically bias velocity measurements and endpoint adjudication.
- Does not address the DURATION of transfusion — STOP established that transfusion prevents stroke but did not define when/if it could be stopped (STOP II later showed it cannot).
- Iron overload burden not fully characterized — the lifelong transfusion commitment creates substantial iron chelation requirements, quality-of-life impact, and healthcare costs not captured in the trial.
- Does not address hydroxyurea as an alternative — the trial predated widespread hydroxyurea use in SCD, leaving the question of whether a less burdensome therapy could achieve similar results (later addressed by TWiTCH).
- TCD screening requires trained operators and standardized protocols — implementation in resource-limited settings where SCD is most prevalent remains challenging.
- Selection of ≥200 cm/s threshold — while validated, some children below this threshold still develop strokes, suggesting the screening misses a proportion of at-risk patients. Conditional (170–199 cm/s) velocities have uncertain management.
Citation
Adams RJ, et al. N Engl J Med 1998;339:5-11.