← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

SAHRANG

SAHRANG: Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Recovery and Galantamine: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Year of Publication: 2025

Authors: Bosco Seong Kyu Yang, Jude P. J. Savarraj, Elena Moreno, ..., H. Alex Choi

Journal: Neurocritical Care

Citation: Neurocrit Care. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02349-3

Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02349-3

PDF: https://www.researchgate.net/publication...saWNhdGlvbiJ9fQ


Clinical Question

Is galantamine safe, tolerable, and potentially efficacious in improving long-term functional and cognitive outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage when administered during early and subacute stages?

Bottom Line

Galantamine was as tolerable and safe as placebo in patients with aSAH when administered early and continued for 90 days. While no significant differences were found in functional or cognitive outcomes, patients receiving galantamine showed greater improvement in quality of life during the early recovery phase (days 30-60).

Major Points

  • First randomized placebo-controlled trial examining galantamine in acute aneurysmal SAH
  • Two-phase dose-escalation design: Phase 1 tested 8 mg q12h, Phase 2 tested 12 mg q12h
  • Interim safety analysis performed after first 30 patients showed no safety concerns
  • Bradycardia was the most common adverse event (37%), but occurred equally in both groups
  • No significant differences in adverse events, serious adverse events, or mortality between groups
  • No significant differences in mRS distribution at any timepoint (discharge, 30, 60, or 90 days)
  • No significant differences in MoCA cognitive scores at 30, 60, or 90 days
  • Galantamine group showed significantly greater improvement in EQ5D5L VAS (quality of life) between days 30-60 (p<0.05)
  • Proinflammatory cytokine levels in serum and CSF did not show consistent differences between groups
  • Study underpowered for efficacy endpoints; designed as pilot/feasibility trial

Design

Study Type: Phase IIA prospective multicenter double-masked randomized placebo-controlled dose-escalation pilot trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-masked (study participants and personnel blinded; ICU personnel and daily assessors blinded; research pharmacy performed unblinded randomization)

Enrollment Period: October 2016 to April 2019 (36 months)

Follow-up Duration: 90 days after ictus

Centers: 2

Countries: United States

Sample Size: 60

Analysis: Bayesian logistic models for safety outcomes; Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for efficacy; chi-square test for mRS distributions; fixed effect linear regression for EQ5D5L analysis adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, HH grade, and disease stage; R statistical software v4.3.3


Inclusion Criteria

  • Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Presentation to hospital within 72 hours of symptom onset
  • Age 18-75 years
  • Fisher grade 3 hemorrhage (thick subarachnoid clot) on initial CT scan
  • Hunt and Hess grade 1-5 at time of randomization
  • Presence of cerebral aneurysm on CT angiogram or angiogram amenable to clipping or coiling
  • Ability to receive medication within 36 hours of securing aneurysm

Exclusion Criteria

  • SAH due to other causes (trauma, arteriovenous malformation, mycotic aneurysms, moyamoya)
  • Renal disease (creatinine clearance <9 ml/min)
  • Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 10-15)
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma
  • Clinically significant arrhythmia
  • Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, autoimmune disease, or malignancy
  • Expected mortality within 72 hours
  • Inability to complete long-term follow-up
  • Severe functional disabilities before admission (pre-admission mRS >1)
  • Pre-existing systemic diseases impacting outcomes (prior stroke, MI, pulmonary disease requiring oxygen, chronic renal failure on hemodialysis, malignancy)
  • History of dementia
  • Documented neurologic and psychiatric disorders
  • Prisoners or pregnant women

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive
Number of patients3030
Mean age (years)54.2 (10.4)48.3 (12.6)
Female23 (76.7%)19 (63.3%)
Hispanic ethnicity16 (53.3%)17 (56.7%)
Mean BMI28 (6)28 (6)
Hypertension48 (80%)48 (80%)
Hyperlipidemia14 (23%)14 (23%)
Tobacco use30 (50%)30 (50%)
Hunt and Hess grade 23 (10.0%)7 (23.3%)
Hunt and Hess grade 312 (40.0%)9 (30.0%)
Hunt and Hess grade 49 (30.0%)10 (33.3%)
Hunt and Hess grade 56 (20.0%)4 (13.3%)
Fisher grade 3100%100%
Aneurysm clipping12 (40.0%)9 (30.0%)
Aneurysm coiling19 (63.3%)21 (70.0%)

Arms

FieldControlGalantamine 8 mg (Phase 1)Galantamine 12 mg (Phase 2)
InterventionMatching placebo tablets administered orally every 12 hours for 90 days, started within 36 hours after securing aneurysmGalantamine 8 mg orally every 12 hours for 90 days, started within 36 hours after securing aneurysm. Dose adjustments allowed based on tolerability.Galantamine 12 mg orally every 12 hours for 90 days, started within 36 hours after securing aneurysm. Dose adjustments allowed based on tolerability.
Duration90 days90 days90 days

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Tolerability: number of patients who stopped study medication due to adverse events associated with study drug; Mortality due to study drug assessed at 90 daysPrimary1 patient discontinued due to nausea; 4 deaths at 90 days1 patient discontinued due to skin rash; 1 death at 90 daysDiscontinuation p=0.92; Mortality p=0.34
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days - medianSecondary2 (IQR 2-4)2 (IQR 1-4)0.37
mRS <3 at 90 days (good functional outcome)Secondary18/30 (60%)17/30 (57%)>0.05
mRS 0-1 at 90 days (excellent outcome)Secondary6/30 (20%)12/30 (40%)>0.05
MoCA score at 30 days - meanSecondary13.2 (9.5)11 (10.4)0.5
MoCA score at 60 days - meanSecondary12.7 (9.8)12.7 (10.9)0.6
MoCA score at 90 days - meanSecondary15.8 (10.1)14 (11.5)0.6
EQ5D5L VAS at 30 days - meanSecondary70 (19)60 (27)0.07
EQ5D5L VAS at 60 days - meanSecondary69 (20)71 (21)0.7
EQ5D5L VAS at 90 days - meanSecondary74 (23)76 (19)0.76
Change in EQ5D5L VAS between days 30-60 (interval improvement)Secondary-1.04 points+10.7 points<0.05
Adjusted interval improvement in EQ5D5L VAS (per 30-day period)SecondaryReference+10.48 points (95% CI 3.07-17.90)<0.05
Any adverse eventAdverse145 events in 30 patients135 events in 29 patientsRR 1.05 (95% CI 0.83-1.33)0.7
Any serious adverse eventAdverse36 events in 17 patients26 events in 17 patientsRR 1.33 (95% CI 0.80-2.22)0.27
BradycardiaAdverse12/30 (40%)11/30 (37%)RR 1.05 (95% CI 0.46-2.39)0.91
Clinical seizureAdverse2/30 (6.7%)1/30 (3.3%)RR 1.00 (95% CI 0.14-7.10)>0.99
Skin rashAdverse1/30 (3.3%)2/30 (6.7%)RR 0.53 (95% CI 0.05-5.81)0.6
Delayed cerebral ischemiaAdverse15 events in 12 patients12 events in 10 patientsRR 1.30 (95% CI 0.61-2.79)0.5
PneumoniaAdverse9 events in 9 patients11 events in 9 patientsRR 0.84 (95% CI 0.35-2.02)0.7
Pulmonary edemaAdverse5 events in 5 patients1 event in 1 patientRR 4.88 (95% CI 0.56-42.29)0.15
Pulmonary embolismAdverse8 events in 8 patients2 events in 2 patientsRR 3.49 (95% CI 0.73-16.73)0.12
Urinary tract infectionAdverse6 events in 6 patients9 events in 9 patientsRR 0.69 (95% CI 0.25-1.94)0.48
HyponatremiaAdverse12 events in 11 patients12 events in 12 patientsRR 1.03 (95% CI 0.46-2.3)0.94

Subgroup Analysis

Post-hoc analysis adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, HH grade, and disease stages showed galantamine associated with 10.48-point higher interval improvement in EQ5D5L VAS per 30-day period (p<0.05, 95% CI 3.07-17.90). No interaction found between treatment arms and disease stages.


Criticisms

  • Pilot study not powered for efficacy outcomes - designed for feasibility assessment only
  • Small sample size (60 patients total) limits generalizability and statistical power
  • Low statistical power (25%) for detecting differences in adverse events
  • Restrictive inclusion criteria (Fisher grade 3 only) limits generalizability to all SAH severity levels
  • Relatively short follow-up period (90 days); long-term effects unknown
  • Unequal losses to follow-up between groups (4 patients total)
  • MoCA has large minimal detectable change (5 points), limiting sensitivity
  • No measurement of serum galantamine levels to assess pharmacokinetics in SAH patients
  • Cytokine measurements at relatively long intervals (≥24 hours) may have missed dynamic changes
  • High baseline incidence of bradycardia in both groups may reflect disease severity rather than drug effect
  • Interim analysis after 30 patients may have influenced enrollment dynamics
  • No assessment of treatment effects in patients with Hunt and Hess grade 5 (most severe)
  • Quality of life improvement marginally above minimal clinically important difference

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1R61NS119640-01A1 and R01NS131469); CCTS program at UT Health Houston; Partial support from Austrian research promotion agency project 860144

Based on: SAHRANG (Neurocritical Care, 2025)

Authors: Bosco Seong Kyu Yang, Jude P. J. Savarraj, Elena Moreno, ..., H. Alex Choi

Citation: Neurocrit Care. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02349-3

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.