Prostacyclin in SAH
(2015)Objective
To investigate the therapeutic potential of prostacyclin on factors related to delayed ischemic neurological deficits (DIND) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, specifically examining effects on cerebral blood flow and vasospasm
Study Summary
• DIND incidence lower in prostacyclin groups but not statistically significant: 21% (1 ng/kg/min), 23% (2 ng/kg/min) vs 38% (placebo), P=0.28
• Moderate-severe vasospasm lower in 1 ng/kg/min group: 17% vs 38% (placebo), P=0.24
Intervention
Continuous intravenous infusion of epoprostenol (prostacyclin) at 1 ng/kg/min or 2 ng/kg/min vs placebo (drug solvent), administered from day 5 to day 10 after SAH
Inclusion Criteria
Aneurysmal SAH treated with coiling or surgery, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons score 1-4, Fisher grade 3 or 4, age 18-85 years, informed consent obtained
Study Design
Arms: Group 1: Prostacyclin 1 ng/kg/min (n=30); Group 2: Prostacyclin 2 ng/kg/min (n=30); Group 3: Placebo (n=30)
Patients per Arm: 30 per arm (90 total enrolled, 89 analyzed)
Outcome
• DIND: 21% (1 ng/kg/min), 23% (2 ng/kg/min) vs 38% (placebo), P=0.28
• Moderate-severe vasospasm: 17% (1 ng/kg/min), 30% (2 ng/kg/min) vs 36% (placebo), P=0.24
• No significant difference in 3-month clinical outcome (GOS) between groups (P=0.46)
• No serious adverse reactions including bleeding or hypotension observed
Bottom Line
Administration of prostacyclin to patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage appears safe and feasible. Global cerebral blood flow after SAH is not markedly affected by prostacyclin administration in the tested dose range (1-2 ng/kg/min). While this pilot trial was not powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes, the observed reduction in point estimates of DIND (21-23% vs 38%) and vasospasm (17-30% vs 36-38%) in prostacyclin groups compared to placebo may represent a treatment effect worth investigating in larger trials. No dose-dependent benefit was observed in the tested range, and future trials should focus on doses around 1 ng/kg/min.
Major Points
- First randomized clinical trial investigating prostacyclin effects on human brain after SAH
- Single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group pilot trial
- 90 patients randomized 1:1:1 to prostacyclin 1 ng/kg/min, 2 ng/kg/min, or placebo
- 264 patients screened, 111 met inclusion criteria, 90 enrolled, 89 analyzed (1 withdrew consent)
- Intervention initiated day 5 after SAH and discontinued day 10 (peak vasospasm period)
- Primary outcome: change in global cerebral blood flow from baseline measured by CT perfusion
- No statistically significant difference in global CBF change between groups (P=0.20)
- Placebo group: mean CBF change -4.65 mL/100g/min (95% CI -8.64 to -0.17)
- 1 ng/kg/min group: mean CBF change -2.05 mL/100g/min (95% CI -5.58 to 1.47)
- 2 ng/kg/min group: mean CBF change -0.066 mL/100g/min (95% CI -3.59 to 3.46)
- DIND incidence highest in placebo (38%), lowest in 1 ng/kg/min group (21%), but not statistically significant (P=0.28)
- Moderate-severe vasospasm: 17% (1 ng/kg/min) vs 36% (placebo), but not statistically significant (P=0.24)
- Risk ratio for DIND with 1 ng/kg/min vs placebo: 0.55 (95% CI 0.23-1.28)
- Risk ratio for vasospasm with 1 ng/kg/min vs placebo: 0.47 (95% CI 0.19-1.19)
- No significant difference in 3-month Glasgow Outcome Scale between groups (P=0.46)
- Adjusted analysis showed trend toward worse outcome in 2 ng/kg/min group (P=0.18)
- Overall 3-month mortality: 3.3% (1 placebo, 2 in 1 ng/kg/min group)
- No serious adverse reactions including bleeding or hypotension observed during infusion
- Similar rate of serious adverse events across all groups (41-46%, P=0.92)
- No significant difference in endovascular intervention rates (17-27%, P=0.68)
- CT perfusion at baseline (day 3±1) and during intervention (day 8±1)
- All scans analyzed by 2 independent blinded reviewers with consensus for discordant results
- No dose-dependent effect observed - 2 ng/kg/min group did not show superior outcomes
- Trial designed to investigate effects during vasospasm phase, not primarily prevention or treatment
Study Design
- Study Type
- Single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, pilot trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind. Computer-generated allocation list accessible only by project nurses not involved in patient care. Nurses prepared blinded trial medication and allocated intervention by telephone contact. Patients, treating physicians, outcome assessors, and data analysts blinded. All analyses performed while preserving blinding. Abstract with conclusions written and approved before unblinding
- Sample Size
- 90
- Follow-up
- 3 months
- Centers
- 1
- Countries
- Denmark
Primary Outcome
Definition: Change in global cerebral blood flow from baseline, calculated as CBF during intervention (day 8±1) minus CBF at baseline (day 3±1). Global CBF estimated from average of 6 predefined cortical regions of interest representative of anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral artery territories in both hemispheres. CBF calculated using deconvolution method on Phillips Brilliance CT scanner covering 4-cm slab at basal ganglia level. Analyzed by 2 independent blinded reviewers with consensus reading for >20% discordance
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean change -4.65 mL/100g/min (95% CI -8.64 to -0.17) | - | - (Placebo: -8.64 to -0.17; 1 ng/kg/min: -5.58 to 1.47; 2 ng/kg/min: -3.59 to 3.46) | 0.20 (unadjusted), 0.21 (adjusted for WFNS grade, Fisher grade, age) |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Single-center study limits generalizability
- Small sample size (90 patients) - pilot trial not powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes
- Only 89 patients analyzed (1 withdrew consent before intervention)
- CT perfusion scans from 3 patients uninterpretable due to head movement, reducing primary outcome analysis to 86 patients
- CT perfusion only covered 4-cm slab at basal ganglia level - could not monitor entire brain for small hypoperfused areas
- Primary outcome (global CBF) is surrogate outcome with unknown association to long-term clinical outcomes
- Intervention timing (days 5-10) makes it neither purely preventative nor purely therapeutic trial
- All patients received intervention regardless of DIND symptoms - potential effect might be more pronounced if only symptomatic patients treated
- Broad confidence intervals due to small sample size limit interpretation of secondary outcomes
- No formal correction for multiple comparisons in secondary outcomes
- CT angiography quality insufficient for interpretation in 3 cases
- Trial design focused on vasospasm phase rather than early prevention
- Dose range tested (1-2 ng/kg/min) may not be optimal - higher doses not explored due to safety concerns
- No dose-dependent effect observed in tested range questions dose selection rationale
- Trend toward worse outcome in high-dose (2 ng/kg/min) group in adjusted analysis (P=0.18)
- CBF as outcome measure is novel for DIND trials with uncertain clinical relevance
- Cannot rule out local perfusion effects that global CBF measurement would miss
- Follow-up limited to 3 months - longer-term outcomes unknown
- Enrollment criteria (WFNS 1-4, Fisher 3-4) may exclude patients most likely to benefit
- No assessment of whether intervention affects only symptomatic vasospasm or prevention
- Timing of baseline CT perfusion (day 3±1) may miss early perfusion changes
Citation
Stroke. 2015;46:37-41