PILLAR-XT
(2025)Objective
Cerebrospinal fluid filtration after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage using extracorporeal filtration system.
Study Summary
Intervention
Neurapheresis CSF Management System with dual-lumen intrathecal catheter for extracorporeal CSF filtration vs. historical controls.
Inclusion Criteria
Age 18-70 years, aneurysmal SAH with Modified Fisher Grade 2-4, Hunt & Hess I-IV, first SAH secured within 48h of bleeding, WFNS Grades I-IV.
Study Design
Arms: PILLAR-XT Neurapheresis System vs. Historical Controls
Patients per Arm: 27 patients successfully treated (29 attempted, 33 enrolled)
Outcome
Bottom Line
The PILLAR-XT study demonstrated that extracorporeal CSF filtration using the Neurapheresis system safely and significantly accelerated intracranial blood elimination, with 65% reduction in Hijdra Sum Score and dramatic reductions in CSF red blood cells (86%) and protein (82%) compared to standard care.
Major Points
- PILLAR-XT was a prospective, single-arm, investigational device exemption study at 6 sites
- 33 patients enrolled, 29 attempted catheter placement, 27 successfully treated (93% success rate)
- Dual-lumen intrathecal catheter placed L3-L4 or L4-L5 with extracorporeal filtration for up to 72 hours
- Primary outcome: 65% reduction in Hijdra Sum Score from enrollment to catheter removal
- CSF red blood cell counts reduced by mean 86% and protein by mean 82%
- Median filtration time 37 hours with median waste rate 5.7 mL/hr
- Reached normal CSF protein levels in 2.1 days vs never achieving normal in standard care
- Excellent safety profile: 5 adverse events in 4 patients, all mild-moderate severity
- 92% of patients maintained or improved Glasgow Coma Scale from admission to ICU discharge
- 64% of patients were at home at 30 days
Study Design
- Study Type
- Prospective, single-arm, investigational device exemption study
- Randomization
- No
- Blinding
- Open-label, no blinding
- Sample Size
- 27
- Follow-up
- 30 days
- Centers
- 6
- Countries
- United States
Primary Outcome
Definition: Hijdra Sum Score reduction from enrollment to catheter removal
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65% mean reduction (25.6 to 7.5 median HSS) | - | <0.001 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Single-arm design without randomized control group
- Small sample size (27 patients successfully treated)
- No direct comparison to standard lumbar drain or EVD
- Historical comparison controls from different studies
- EVDs were opened in 11/27 patients during treatment
- Limited follow-up duration (30 days)
- Study did not evaluate impact on long-term clinical outcomes
- Potential selection bias inherent in device exemption study design
Citation
Neurocrit Care. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02328-8