← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

OPTIMAL-BP

Intensive vs Conventional Blood Pressure Lowering After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Year of Publication: 2023

Authors: Hyo Suk Nam, Young Dae Kim, JoonNyung Heo, ..., for the OPTIMAL-BP Trial Investigators

Journal: JAMA

Citation: JAMA. 2023;330(9):832-842.

Link: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2808869

PDF: https://tinyurl.com/3tfex8mr


Clinical Question

Does intensive blood pressure management (SBP <140 mmHg) during the first 24 hours after successful EVT lead to better functional outcomes than conventional BP management (SBP 140-180 mmHg) in acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion?

Bottom Line

Intensive BP lowering (SBP <140 mmHg) after successful EVT was harmful: functional independence at 3 months was significantly lower (39.4% vs 54.4%; adjusted OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.33-0.96; P=0.03). Malignant cerebral edema was significantly more frequent (7.7% vs 1.3%; adjusted OR 7.88; P=0.01). sICH rates were similar (9.0% vs 8.1%). Trial terminated early for safety/futility (conditional power 1.22%).

Major Points

  • Intensive BP lowering was harmful: SBP <140 mmHg for 24h after EVT reduced functional independence from 54.4% to 39.4% (adjusted OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.33-0.96; P=0.03).
  • Malignant cerebral edema significantly increased: 7.7% intensive vs 1.3% conventional (adjusted OR 7.88; 95% CI 1.57-39.39; P=0.01).
  • No benefit for sICH: 9.0% intensive vs 8.1% conventional (P=0.82).
  • Death within 3 months: 7.7% vs 5.4% (P=0.31), not significant but numerically higher with intensive management.
  • Trial stopped early: DSMB recommended termination for futility (conditional power 1.22%) and safety concerns from concurrent ENCHANTED2/MT results.
  • BP separation achieved: 24h mean SBP 129.2 vs 138.0 mmHg (difference -9.6 mmHg; P<0.001).
  • mRS shift analysis also favored conventional: adjusted OR 0.65 (95% CI 0.43-0.97; P=0.04).
  • Reverse J-shaped curve: post hoc analysis showed very low SBP in intensive group associated with worst outcomes.
  • All subgroup analyses favored conventional management — no significant interactions.
  • Consistent with ENCHANTED2/MT: both trials showed intensive BP lowering after EVT worsens outcomes. SBP 140-180 mmHg appears adequate.

Design

Study Type: Multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) clinical trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Open-label; blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE). mRS by certified staff blinded to allocation. Neuroimaging adjudicated centrally by blinded reviewers. Permuted block (size 4), stratified by hospital and NIHSS (<15 vs ≥15).

Enrollment Period: June 18, 2020 to November 29, 2022

Follow-up Duration: 3 months

Centers: 19

Countries: South Korea

Sample Size: 302

Analysis: Intention-to-treat (primary); per-protocol (sensitivity). Binary logistic regression for primary outcome. Planned sample 668; stopped early at 306.


Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults aged ≥20 years.
  • Underwent EVT for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion.
  • Successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b).
  • Elevated SBP ≥140 mmHg on ≥2 measurements within 2-minute interval.
  • Measurements taken within 2 hours of successful reperfusion.

Exclusion Criteria

  • SBP <140 mmHg after successful reperfusion (n=705 excluded).
  • Contraindication to antihypertensive medications.
  • sICH evident during or immediately after EVT.
  • Serious medical or surgical illness.
  • Prestroke disability (mRS 3-5).
  • Reperfusion failure (mTICI ≤2a).
  • Participation in a study not allowing dual enrollment.
  • Age <20 years.

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicIntensive (N=155)Conventional (N=147)
Age (mean±SD)73.2±12.172.9±10.8
Female sex63 (40.6%)59 (40.1%)
Hypertension121 (78.1%)110 (74.8%)
Atrial fibrillation77 (49.7%)69 (46.9%)
Diabetes65 (41.9%)62 (42.2%)
Hyperlipidemia61 (39.4%)54 (36.7%)
Smoking39 (25.2%)29 (19.7%)
Previous stroke36 (23.2%)30 (20.4%)
NIHSS median (IQR)13 (6)12 (7)
IV tPA use44 (28.4%)54 (36.7%)
TOAST Cardioembolic76 (49.0%)76 (51.7%)
TOAST Large artery41 (26.5%)43 (29.3%)
Onset to puncture median (IQR)388 (223.5-692.5) min357 (209-725) min
Puncture to reperfusion median (IQR)30 (22-47) min31 (20-48) min
Mean SBP at enrollment (±SD)155.2±13.4 mmHg154.8±14.4 mmHg
Intracranial stent/angioplasty25.2%21.1%

Arms

FieldIntensive BP ManagementControl
InterventionSBP target <140 mmHg for 24 hours after enrollment. Goal to reach target within 1 hour. Continuous noninvasive BP monitoring. IV BP-lowering drugs (nicardipine preferred) used in 74.2%. Time in target: 83.0%. 24h mean SBP achieved: 129.2±7.7 mmHg.SBP target 140-180 mmHg for 24 hours after enrollment. Vasopressors NOT used if SBP dropped below 140. IV BP-lowering drugs used in 18.7%. Time in target: 42.1% (SBP often spontaneously <140). 24h mean SBP: 138.0±13.6 mmHg.
Duration24 hours post-enrollment24 hours post-enrollment

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Functional independence at 3 months (mRS 0-2)Primary80/147 (54.4%)61/155 (39.4%)0.03
mRS shift analysis (ordinal)SecondaryAdjusted OR 0.650.04
Excellent recovery at 24h (NIHSS 0-1 or ≥8pt improvement)Secondary37/148 (25.0%)25/153 (16.3%)Adjusted OR 0.620.11
Successful reperfusion at 24hSecondary132/141 (93.6%)132/146 (90.4%)OR 0.640.37
Functional independence at 1 month (mRS 0-2)Secondary72/144 (50.0%)56/150 (37.3%)Adjusted OR 0.650.12
EQ-5D-3L at 3 months (mean±SD)Secondary0.61±0.400.50±0.43Adjusted β -0.080.05
sICH within 36hAdverse12/149 (8.1%)14/155 (9.0%)Adjusted OR 1.100.82
Death within 3 monthsAdverse8/147 (5.4%)12/155 (7.7%)Adjusted OR 1.730.31
Malignant cerebral edema within 36hAdverse2/149 (1.3%)12/155 (7.7%)Adjusted OR 7.880.01
SBP drop <100 mmHgAdverse17.3%29.7%

Subgroup Analysis

No significant interactions across prespecified subgroups (age, sex, time from onset, NIHSS). All point estimates favored conventional management.


Criticisms

  • Early termination: 306 vs planned 668 patients — reduced power and risk of overestimated treatment effects.
  • Only 19.1% of screened patients enrolled; ~half excluded because SBP <140 — selection bias.
  • Conventional group spent only 42.1% in target range (SBP often spontaneously <140) — may have underpowered the comparison.
  • Wide CI for malignant edema (OR 7.88, CI 1.57-39.39) — small events, model instability.
  • South Korean population only — may not generalize to other ethnicities.
  • Open-label intervention (though blinded endpoint).
  • Cannot determine optimal drug class — nicardipine most common but not mandated.

Funding

Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center (PACEN), Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant HC19C0028).

Based on: OPTIMAL-BP (JAMA, 2023)

Authors: Hyo Suk Nam, Young Dae Kim, JoonNyung Heo, ..., for the OPTIMAL-BP Trial Investigators

Citation: JAMA. 2023;330(9):832-842.

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.