NOAH-AFNET 6
(2023)Objective
Edoxaban versus placebo in patients with device-detected atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) without ECG-documented atrial fibrillation.
Study Summary
Intervention
Edoxaban 60 mg daily (or 30 mg if dose reduction criteria met) vs. placebo; patients were ≥65 years with AHRE ≥6 minutes and at least one stroke risk factor; median follow-up was 21 months.
Study Design
Arms: Edoxaban vs Placebo
Outcome
Bottom Line
Edoxaban did not significantly reduce cardiovascular death, stroke, or systemic embolism but increased major bleeding risk in patients with AHREs.
Major Points
- Edoxaban showed no statistically significant reduction in primary efficacy outcome (HR 0.81; P=0.15).
- Stroke incidence was low in both groups (~1%/year).
- Major bleeding was significantly higher in the edoxaban group (HR 2.10; P=0.002).
- Trial stopped early due to safety concerns and futility.
- Study included older, high-risk patients (mean age 78, median CHA₂DS₂-VASc score 4).
Study Design
- Study Type
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind
- Sample Size
- 2536
- Follow-up
- Median 21 months
- Centers
- 206
- Countries
- Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom
Primary Outcome
Definition: Composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or systemic embolism
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0% per patient-year | 3.2% per patient-year | 0.81 (0.60–1.08) | 0.15 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Trial stopped early, limiting power to detect modest benefits.
- Stroke rate lower than expected, may reflect low AHRE burden.
- Unclear generalizability to other NOACs beyond edoxaban.
- Predominantly White European population.
Citation
Kirchhof P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(13):1167–1179.