IMASH
(2010)Objective
To test whether intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion for 10-14 days, in addition to oral nimodipine, improves neurological outcome in patients with acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Study Summary
• No differences in secondary outcomes (mRS, Barthel Index, SF-36, clinical vasospasm)
• No subgroups showed benefit from magnesium sulfate
• Results do not support clinical benefit of IV magnesium sulfate in aSAH
Intervention
IV magnesium sulfate (20 mmol bolus then 80 mmol/day continuous infusion, titrated to achieve serum Mg ~2× baseline and ≤2.5 mmol/L) vs saline placebo for 10-14 days
Inclusion Criteria
Age ≥18 years, radiological diagnosis of SAH, intracranial aneurysm causing SAH, randomization within 48 hours of onset, negative pregnancy test if woman of childbearing potential
Study Design
Arms: Magnesium sulfate vs Saline placebo
Patients per Arm: MgSO4: 169, Saline: 158
Outcome
• Clinical vasospasm: MgSO4 25% vs saline 18% (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.9-2.5)
• Good outcome (mRS 0-2): MgSO4 57% vs saline 58%
• Barthel Index ≥85: MgSO4 57% vs saline 61%
• SF-36 scores: no significant differences
• Inpatient mortality: MgSO4 10% vs saline 12%
Bottom Line
This Phase III multicenter RCT found no clinical benefit of IV magnesium sulfate infusion over placebo in patients with acute aneurysmal SAH. Despite achieving significantly higher serum magnesium levels, there was no difference in the primary outcome (favorable GOSE 5-8 at 6 months: 64% MgSO4 vs 63% saline, OR 1.0). Secondary outcomes including clinical vasospasm, mRS, Barthel Index, and SF-36 also showed no significant differences. No subgroup showed benefit from magnesium sulfate. The results do not support routine use of IV magnesium sulfate in aSAH patients.
Major Points
- Multicenter (10 centers), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trial
- 327 patients recruited between June 2002 and December 2008 (387 total minus 60 pilot study patients)
- Treatment initiated within 48 hours of SAH onset (mean 31.7±15.5 hours)
- Primary outcome (GOSE 5-8 at 6 months): no difference (MgSO4 64% vs saline 63%, OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.6)
- Clinical vasospasm: no significant difference (MgSO4 25% vs saline 18%, OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.9-2.5)
- Good outcome mRS 0-2: no difference (MgSO4 57% vs saline 58%, OR 1.0)
- Excellent outcome mRS 0-1: no difference (MgSO4 46% vs saline 45%, OR 1.0)
- Barthel Index ≥85: no difference (MgSO4 57% vs saline 61%, OR 0.9)
- SF-36 physical and mental scores: no significant differences
- Average serum magnesium significantly higher in MgSO4 group (1.67±0.27 vs 0.91±0.16 mmol/L, p<0.001)
- Mean TCD middle cerebral artery velocities: no difference (82±31 vs 87±61 cm/s, p=0.487)
- 91% completed at least 10 days of study drug infusion
- Inpatient mortality similar: MgSO4 10% vs saline 12% (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.6)
- Hypotension: MgSO4 15% vs saline 13% (p=0.590)
- No difference in adverse events between groups
- No subgroup showed benefit from magnesium sulfate in prespecified analyses
- Study drug stopped in only 3 patients (1%) due to adverse events
- Follow-up: 96% at 6 months (11 patients lost to follow-up total)
Study Design
- Study Type
- Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind. Computer-generated randomization list from central office. Hong Kong and Australia sites: internet randomization. China and Southeast Asia sites: sealed envelopes in order. Group assignments and infusion handling by dedicated site research nurse. Patients, assessors, and healthcare staff blinded to group identity. Treatment allocation concealed from outcome assessors
- Sample Size
- 327
- Follow-up
- 6 months
- Centers
- 10
- Countries
- Hong Kong, China, Malaysia, Australia
Primary Outcome
Definition: Favorable outcome defined as Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) score 5-8 at 6 months
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100/158 (63%) | 108/169 (64%) | - (0.7 to 1.6) | Not significant |
Limitations & Criticisms
- No clinical benefit demonstrated despite achieving target magnesium levels
- Low CSF penetration of peripherally infused magnesium (only 11-21% increase) may explain lack of efficacy
- Brain free intracellular magnesium increased only 13% - may be insufficient
- No vasodilatory effect demonstrated (TCD velocities similar between groups)
- Treatment window (within 48 hours) may be too late for neuroprotection from early brain injury
- Sample size may have been insufficient based on actual control group outcome (63% favorable vs 50% expected)
- Post hoc power analysis showed only 0.49 power for 10% improvement
- No assessment of angiographic vasospasm (CT angiography not validated at time of protocol design)
- Cognitive outcomes not comprehensively assessed (SF-36 completed in only 58% of survivors)
- Academically funded study without industry support - lack of on-site monitoring
- Last observation carried forward method for missing data (4%) could introduce bias
- Magnesium sulfate known to lower blood pressure - potential for adverse effects not fully explored
- Daily blood pressure data not incorporated in trial design
- Higher target magnesium (2.5 mmol/L) limited by toxicity concerns
- Direct intracisternal infusion not evaluated (may achieve better CSF levels)
- Primary outcome (GOSE) may not be sensitive enough to detect subtle improvements
- Composite cognitive function assessment would have been better outcome measure
- Recruitment barriers: late presentation, refusal, unavailable consent
- Only 327 of 348 planned patients enrolled (94% of target)
Citation
Stroke. 2010;41:921-926