CLEAR Eptifibatide
(2008)Objective
To assess the safety of combining low-dose rt-PA with the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide in acute ischemic stroke within 3 hours of onset.
Study Summary
• Despite older age and higher NIHSS in the combo group, no increase in bleeding
• No significant differences in efficacy outcomes vs standard rt-PA
Intervention
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter dose-escalation trial comparing reduced-dose rt-PA + eptifibatide vs standard rt-PA alone within 3 hours of stroke. Two dose tiers of rt-PA (0.3 and 0.45 mg/kg) were tested.
Inclusion Criteria
• Age 18–80
• NIHSS >5
• Symptom onset <3 hours
• Serious, measurable neurologic deficit
Study Design
Arms: Low-dose rt-PA + eptifibatide vs standard-dose rt-PA
Patients per Arm: 69 combination, 25 standard rt-PA
Outcome
• No efficacy advantage; Barthel Index favored standard rt-PA
• Trial halted early due to sufficient safety data
Bottom Line
Low-dose rt-PA plus eptifibatide was safe and did not increase symptomatic ICH compared to standard-dose rt-PA, despite higher risk baseline features.
Major Points
- Randomized 3:1 trial of 69 patients on combination therapy vs 25 on standard rt-PA
- Dose-escalation design: rt-PA 0.3 mg/kg (Tier 1) and 0.45 mg/kg (Tier 2) + eptifibatide
- Symptomatic ICH: 1.4% in combo group vs 8.0% in rt-PA-only group
- No significant efficacy benefit; Barthel Index slightly favored standard rt-PA
- Trial halted early due to acceptable safety profile
Study Design
- Study Type
- Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation safety trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind (drug preparation and administration)
- Sample Size
- 94
- Follow-up
- 90 days
- Centers
- 19
- Countries
- USA
Primary Outcome
Definition: Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2/25 (8.0%) | 1/69 (1.4%) | - (0%–4.3% (combo), 0%–19.2% (control)) | 0.17 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Significant baseline imbalance in NIHSS and age
- Small sample size limits efficacy interpretation
- Complex blinding protocol caused treatment delays
- Trial not powered for clinical outcome comparison
Citation
Stroke. 2008;39(12):3268–3276. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.517656