BRETIS-TNK
(2024)Objective
BRETIS-TNK tests whether intra-arterial tenecteplase during thrombectomy improves outcomes in acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion.
Study Summary
• Primary outcome: mRS 0–2 at 90 days
• Adaptive design with interim analysis after 150 patients
Intervention
Patients with LVO stroke undergoing thrombectomy within 24h randomized to receive either standard EVT or EVT with intra-arterial tenecteplase (up to 12 mg).
Inclusion Criteria
Age ≥18, ASPECTS ≥6, mRS ≤2, eligible for EVT within 24h, anterior or posterior LVO
Study Design
Arms: Intra-arterial TNK + EVT vs Standard EVT
Patients per Arm: 190 per arm (planned total 380)
Outcome
• Secondary: mRS 0–1, early NIHSS improvement, reperfusion rates
• Safety: sICH, death, parenchymal hemorrhage
Bottom Line
Protocol paper for the first RCT of intra-arterial tenecteplase during EVT for LVO stroke. Two-phase IA-TNK strategy: 4mg distal to clot pre-retrieval, then continuous infusion during stent retriever deployment. Pilot showed first-pass reperfusion 53.8% vs 36.0% and 90-day good outcome 50% vs 34.6%. Planned 380 patients, ~30 Chinese centers. Adaptive enrichment design with interim at n=150.
Major Points
- First RCT of IA-TNK during (not after) EVT for LVO stroke. Protocol paper — no results yet.
- Unique two-phase IA strategy: 4mg TNK distal to clot, then 0.4 mg/min during retriever deployment.
- Max cumulative IA-TNK: 9-12 mg depending on number of passes.
- Pilot (BRETIS-TNK): first-pass reperfusion 53.8% vs 36.0%; good outcome 50% vs 34.6%.
- Planned 380 patients (190/arm), ~30 Chinese centers. 80% power for 15% absolute improvement.
- Adaptive enrichment: interim at n=150 may adjust dose, remove subgroups, or terminate.
- 0-24h window, anterior + posterior circulation. ASPECTS ≥6.
- Dose reduced to 0.15 mg/min if concurrent IV thrombolysis.
- Builds on CHOICE trial (IA alteplase post-EVT) with TNK instead.
- ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05657444. Enrollment March 2023 to March 2025.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, adaptive enrichment trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Outcomes assessed by blinded assessors
- Sample Size
- 380
- Follow-up
- 90 days
- Centers
- 30
- Countries
- China
Primary Outcome
Definition: Proportion of patients with mRS 0–2 at 90±7 days
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| - |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Trial not yet completed; results pending
- Adaptive design may limit comparison to traditional RCTs
- Complex intervention protocol could reduce generalizability
Citation
Stroke Vasc Neurol 2024;9:e002377. doi:10.1136/svn-2023-002377