← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

MIND Diet Trial

MIND diet slows cognitive decline with aging

Year of Publication: 2015

Authors: Martha Clare Morris, Christy C. Tangney, Yamin Wang, ..., Neelum T. Aggarwal

Journal: Alzheimer's & Dementia

Citation: Alzheimers Dement. 2015 September;11(9):1015-1022

Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.04.011


Clinical Question

Does adherence to the MIND diet (Mediterranean-DASH Diet Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay) slow cognitive decline in older adults, and how does it compare to Mediterranean and DASH diets?

Bottom Line

Higher MIND diet scores were significantly associated with slower cognitive decline, with the difference between highest and lowest tertiles equivalent to being 7.5 years younger in age. The MIND diet was more predictive of cognitive preservation than either the Mediterranean or DASH diet alone.

Major Points

  • MIND diet score was positively associated with slower global cognitive decline (β=0.0092, p<0.0001)
  • Difference in cognitive decline rates between highest and lowest MIND score tertiles equivalent to 7.5 years younger age
  • MIND diet showed stronger predictive association than Mediterranean (standardized β 4.39 vs 2.46, p=0.02) or DASH (2.60, p=0.03) diets
  • Associations were significant for all 5 cognitive domains: episodic memory, semantic memory, perceptual speed, perceptual organization, and working memory
  • Effects persisted after adjustment for cardiovascular conditions (hypertension, stroke, MI, diabetes)
  • Excluding 220 participants with MCI at baseline increased the protective estimate by 9.5%
  • MIND diet uniquely specifies green leafy vegetables and berries but does not score overall fruit consumption
  • Brain-healthy foods include those high in vitamin E, folate, carotenoids, and flavonoids which inhibit β-amyloid deposition

Design

Study Type: Prospective observational cohort study

Randomization:

Blinding: Not applicable (observational study)

Enrollment Period: February 2004 - 2013

Follow-up Duration: Average 4.7 years (range 2-10 years)

Centers: 1

Countries: United States

Sample Size: 960

Analysis: Linear mixed models with random effects, time-varying covariates, adjusted for age, sex, education, APOE-ε4, smoking, physical activity, cognitive activities, total energy intake; sensitivity analyses excluding MCI participants and those with diet score changes


Inclusion Criteria

  • Participants in Rush Memory and Aging Project (MAP)
  • Residents of >40 retirement communities and senior public housing units in Chicago area
  • Free of known dementia at enrollment
  • Completed food frequency questionnaires
  • Survived and had at least 2 cognitive assessments

Exclusion Criteria

  • Dementia based on clinical criteria
  • MCI participants excluded only in secondary analyses (n=220)

Arms

FieldControlMIND Diet Score Tertile 2 (Mid)MIND Diet Score Tertile 3 (High)
InterventionLowest adherence to MIND diet (median score 6, range 2.5-6.5)Moderate adherence to MIND diet (median score 7.5, range 7.0-8.0)Highest adherence to MIND diet (median score 9.5, range 8.5-12.5)
DurationObservational follow-up average 4.7 yearsObservational follow-up average 4.7 yearsObservational follow-up average 4.7 years

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Change in global cognitive score (composite of 19 standardized neuropsychological tests) over timePrimary<0.0001
Episodic Memory (7-test composite) | MIND score effect: β=0.0080 (SE 0.0028)Secondary0.004
Semantic Memory (3-test composite) | MIND score effect: β=0.0105 (SE 0.0027)Secondary0.0001
Perceptual Speed (4-test composite) | MIND score effect: β=0.0084 (SE 0.0024)Secondary0.0003
Perceptual Organization (2-test composite) | MIND score effect: β=0.0077 (SE 0.0025)Secondary0.002
Working Memory (3-test composite) | MIND score effect: β=0.0050 (SE 0.0024)Secondary0.04
Comparison: MIND vs Mediterranean diet | Standardized β coefficients: MIND 4.39 vs Mediterranean 2.46Secondary0.02
Comparison: MIND vs DASH diet | Standardized β coefficients: MIND 4.39 vs DASH 2.60Secondary0.03
Observational cohort studyAdverseObservational study (MAP cohort, Morris 2015) - no safety data extracted

Subgroup Analysis

No effect modification found by age, sex, APOE-ε4, education, physical activity, BMI categories (≤20 or ≥30), or cardiovascular conditions (hypertension, MI, stroke, diabetes). Excluding MCI participants at baseline increased protective estimate by 9.5%. Excluding participants with major diet score changes over time increased protective estimate by 26%.


Criticisms

  • Observational design cannot establish causation; requires randomized dietary intervention trial for confirmation
  • Population was 95% white, 98.5% non-Hispanic, and predominantly female (75%), limiting generalizability
  • Population was elderly (mean age 81.4 years), findings may not apply to younger populations
  • Limited questionnaire items for some diet components (single items for nuts, berries, beans, olive oil)
  • Self-reported diet subject to recall bias, particularly in cognitively impaired adults
  • Residual confounding possible despite extensive covariate adjustment
  • MIND diet score components selected based on existing literature, not independently validated
  • MIND diet correlated with Mediterranean (r=0.62) and DASH (r=0.50) diets, making independent effects difficult to distinguish

Funding

National Institute on Aging grants R01AG031553 and R01AG17917

Based on: MIND Diet Trial (Alzheimer's & Dementia, 2015)

Authors: Martha Clare Morris, Christy C. Tangney, Yamin Wang, ..., Neelum T. Aggarwal

Citation: Alzheimers Dement. 2015 September;11(9):1015-1022

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.