← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

INDIGO

Vorasidenib in IDH1- or IDH2-Mutant Low-Grade Glioma

Year of Publication: 2023

Authors: Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Martin J. van den Bent, Deborah T. Blumenthal, ..., for the INDIGO Trial Investigators

Journal: New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: N Engl J Med 2023;389:589-601

Link: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2304194

PDF: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2304194


Clinical Question

In patients with residual or recurrent grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma who have undergone surgery only, does vorasidenib (a dual IDH1/IDH2 inhibitor) improve progression-free survival compared with placebo during the watch-and-wait period?

Bottom Line

Vorasidenib significantly improved median progression-free survival from 11.1 to 27.7 months (HR 0.39, P<0.001) and delayed the time to next intervention (HR 0.26, P<0.001) in grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma patients on watch-and-wait after surgery. This was the first phase 3 trial to demonstrate efficacy of a targeted IDH inhibitor in glioma, offering a well-tolerated oral therapy that can defer radiation and chemotherapy.

Major Points

  • INDIGO was the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of a targeted IDH inhibitor in glioma, enrolling 331 patients at 77 centers across 10 countries.
  • The trial uniquely targeted the watch-and-wait population — patients with residual/recurrent grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma after surgery who had not yet received radiation or chemotherapy.
  • The primary endpoint was met with a dramatic 61% reduction in the risk of progression or death: median PFS 27.7 vs 11.1 months (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.27-0.56; P<0.001).
  • The key secondary endpoint — time to next intervention (RT, chemo, or surgery) — was even more striking: HR 0.26 (95% CI 0.15-0.43; P<0.001), meaning vorasidenib substantially delayed the need for more toxic therapies.
  • At the data cutoff, imaging-based progression occurred in only 28.0% of the vorasidenib group vs 54.0% of the placebo group. No deaths occurred in either group at median follow-up of 14.2 months.
  • The safety profile was manageable: grade >=3 AEs in 22.8% (vorasidenib) vs 13.5% (placebo). The main toxicity was elevated ALT (grade >=3 in 9.6% vs 0%), requiring liver function monitoring.
  • The trial was unblinded early at the second prespecified interim analysis based on overwhelming efficacy, and patients in the placebo group were allowed to cross over to vorasidenib.
  • INDIGO represents a paradigm shift in low-grade glioma management — offering a targeted, oral therapy during the watch-and-wait period that can delay or defer the neurotoxicity associated with radiation and chemotherapy.

Design

Study Type: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, international, phase 3 trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind (patients, investigators, sponsor); blinded independent review committee for imaging assessment

Enrollment Period: January 2020 - February 2022

Follow-up Duration: Median 14.2 months (data cutoff September 6, 2022)

Centers: 77

Countries: 10 countries

Sample Size: 331

Analysis: Intention-to-treat; stratified log-rank test; stratified Cox proportional-hazards model; group-sequential design with 3 prespecified interim analyses; fixed-sequence testing for primary and key secondary endpoints


Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive

Arms

FieldExperimentalControl
InterventionVorasidenib 40 mg orally once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or need for other anticancer therapyMatched placebo orally once daily in continuous 28-day cycles; crossover to vorasidenib permitted after confirmed imaging-based progression
Duration

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
PFS (blinded independent review, RANO-LGG): median 27.7 vs 11.1 months; HR 0.39 (95% CI 0.27-0.56); P<0.001Primary0.39P<0.001
Time to next intervention: HR 0.26 (95% CI 0.15-0.43); P<0.001Secondary0.26P<0.001
Imaging-based progression: 47/168 (28.0%) vs 88/163 (54.0%)Secondary
No deaths in either groupSecondary
Objective response rate and tumor growth rate: not yet matureSecondary
Grade >=3 AEs: 22.8% vs 13.5%Secondary
ALT elevation grade >=3: 9.6% vs 0%; AST elevation grade >=3: 2.4% vs 0%Secondary
Treatment discontinuation due to AE: 3.6% (vorasidenib) vs 1.2% (placebo)Secondary
Not reportedAdverseNo adverse event data extracted for this trial

Funding

Servier (acquired Agios Pharmaceuticals oncology business, the original sponsor)

Based on: INDIGO (New England Journal of Medicine, 2023)

Authors: Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Martin J. van den Bent, Deborah T. Blumenthal, ..., for the INDIGO Trial Investigators

Citation: N Engl J Med 2023;389:589-601

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.