Nuedexta Bulbar Function Trial
(2017)Objective
To determine whether Nuedexta (dextromethorphan/quinidine) enhanced speech, swallowing, and salivation in patients with ALS
Study Summary
• All three bulbar domains improved: salivation (p=0.004), speech (p=0.003), and swallowing (p=0.009)
• Improvement occurred regardless of pseudobulbar affect status
Intervention
Nuedexta (dextromethorphan 20mg/quinidine 10mg) vs placebo in crossover design
Inclusion Criteria
Adults ≥18 years with probable/definite ALS per El Escorial criteria, disease duration <2 years from diagnosis, bulbar dysfunction (dysarthria and/or dysphagia), CNS-BFS score 50-80, slow vital capacity ≥50% of normal
Study Design
Arms: Crossover design: Nuedexta then placebo (n=31) vs Placebo then Nuedexta (n=29)
Patients per Arm: 60 total randomized (crossover design)
Outcome
• ALSFRS-R bulbar component improved (p=0.003)
• Motor and respiratory ALSFRS-R components unchanged
Bottom Line
Nuedexta significantly improved bulbar function in ALS patients, with improvements in all three domains (speech, swallowing, salivation) as measured by the CNS-BFS. The effect was independent of pseudobulbar affect status, suggesting a direct benefit on bulbar motor neuron function.
Major Points
- This is the first controlled study to report improvement of bulbar function (speech, swallowing, salivation) in ALS
- The primary endpoint CNS-BFS score improved from 59.3 (placebo) to 53.5 (active treatment), a difference of -5.85 points (p<0.001)
- All three bulbar domains improved significantly: salivation (p=0.004), speech (p=0.003), swallowing (p=0.009)
- The ALSFRS-R bulbar component also improved (p=0.003), but motor and respiratory components were unaffected
- Treatment effect was independent of pseudobulbar affect (PBA) status - patients with and without PBA both benefited
- Approximately 49% of patients improved ≥1 point on ALSFRS-R bulbar domain with DMQ vs 26% on placebo
- The study was driven by patient reports of improved speech/swallowing while taking Nuedexta for emotional lability
- Trial used a novel self-report scale (CNS-BFS) as primary outcome, which proved more sensitive than quantitative measures
Study Design
- Study Type
- Phase II, multicenter, double-blind, randomized crossover trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind. Study patients, site investigators, and all study staff including project and data management personnel and study sponsor were blinded. Research pharmacists who prepared and shipped drug supplies were unblinded.
- Sample Size
- 60
- Follow-up
- 70 days total (28-30 days per treatment arm with 10-15 day washout)
- Centers
- 7
- Countries
- United States
Primary Outcome
Definition: Change in Center for Neurologic Study Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) total score. The CNS-BFS is a 21-item self-report scale assessing 3 domains: speech, swallowing, and salivation (score range 21-112, lower is better).
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 59.31 (SE 1.10) | 53.45 (SE 1.07) | - | <0.001 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Short study duration (70 days total) - does not address long-term durability of treatment effect
- Small sample size (60 patients) limits power for subgroup analyses
- Study not designed to predict duration of treatment effect or impact on disease progression
- Phase II trial - requires Phase III confirmation
- Crossover design may have carryover effects despite washout period
- Self-report primary outcome may be subject to bias
- Quantitative measures (speech rate, timed swallowing) did not reach statistical significance
- 18 of 52 completers (35%) showed same or worse CNS-BFS scores with DMQ vs placebo
- Population predominantly white (95%) and non-Hispanic (100%), limiting generalizability
- Majority had bulbar onset ALS (63.3%), which may not represent typical ALS population
- No effect on motor or respiratory function limits applicability to overall ALS management
- Mechanism of action not fully elucidated
Citation
Neurotherapeutics (2017) 14:762-772