← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

JETALS


Clinical Question

Does twice-weekly IM ultrahigh-dose methylcobalamin 50 mg slow ALSFRS-R decline in early-stage ALS with moderate progression rate?

Bottom Line

In 129 Japanese ALS patients enrolled within 1 year of onset who dropped 1-2 points on ALSFRS-R during 12-week observation, IM methylcobalamin 50 mg twice weekly slowed 16-week decline to -2.66 vs -4.63 with placebo (LSM difference 1.97 points; 95% CI 0.44-3.50; p=0.01) — a 43% reduction in functional deterioration. Safety profile matched placebo. Supports a role for ultrahigh-dose methylcobalamin in early, moderate-progressor ALS.

Major Points

  • Investigator-initiated multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 RCT at 25 Japanese neurology centers, Oct 2017 - Sept 2019 (Oki/Izumi 2022)
  • Enriched design: 12-week observation filtered to moderate progressors (1- or 2-point ALSFRS-R drop)
  • N=130 randomized; N=129 in full analysis set after exclusion of one misdiagnosis; 126 (97%) completed
  • Intervention: IM methylcobalamin 50 mg or placebo twice weekly for 16 weeks
  • Primary endpoint: LSM difference in ALSFRS-R from baseline to week 16
  • Result: methylcobalamin -2.66 vs placebo -4.63, difference 1.97 (95% CI 0.44-3.50; p=0.01)
  • 43% reduction in functional deterioration — matches 45% effect in prior post-hoc analysis
  • Week 4 difference already significant (0.99; p=0.003); slope analysis confirms durable effect
  • Plasma homocysteine dropped significantly with methylcobalamin (target engagement confirmed)
  • FVC, manual muscle test, Norris scale, ALSAQ-40 showed numerical but non-significant trends
  • Safety excellent: no deaths, no respiratory events, AE rates similar (62% vs 66%); 91% on concomitant riluzole
  • Supports regulatory approval in Japan for early-stage moderate-progressor ALS; open-label extension continues to 2024

Design

Study Type: Multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 RCT (NCT03548311)

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind (separate blinded efficacy and unblinded safety evaluators per site)

Follow-up Duration: 12-week observation + 16-week randomized + open-label extension to March 2024

Sample Size: 130

Analyzed: 129

Analysis: Linear mixed-effect model for repeated measures, unstructured covariance; 1-tailed p<0.025 significance


Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults ≥20 years ambulatory
  • Sporadic or familial ALS: definite, probable, or probable laboratory-supported per updated Awaji criteria
  • Within 1 year of ALS symptom onset
  • 1- or 2-point ALSFRS-R decrease over 12-week observation period
  • FVC >60%; no prior non-invasive respiratory support or tracheostomy

Exclusion Criteria

  • ALSFRS-R unchanged or ≥3-point decline over observation (too stable or too rapid)
  • FVC ≤60%
  • Any history of non-invasive respiratory support or tracheostomy
  • Edaravone use within 4 weeks of observation period or during double-blind
  • Pregnancy or other active serious medical condition

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive
N6465
Age60.8 ± 12.161.2 ± 11.4
Male40 (63%)34 (52%)
Onset to enrollment (mo)8.5 ± 2.38.2 ± 2.4
ALSFRS-R baseline42.3 ± 2.742.4 ± 2.6
FVC %90.6 ± 16.993.4 ± 16.9
Riluzole concomitant58 (91%)58 (89%)
Bulbar onset19 (30%)19 (29%)

Arms

FieldControlMethylcobalamin
N6465
InterventionPlacebo IM (2 mL) twice weekly in thigh/buttock/deltoid (4 mL total across 2 sites)Methylcobalamin 50 mg IM twice weekly (2 mL per site, 2 sites)
Duration16 weeks16 weeks + open-label extension

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Change in ALSFRS-R total score from baseline to week 16Primary-4.63 (SE 0.60)-2.66 (SE 0.61)p=0.01
ALSFRS-R change to week 4Secondary-1.19 (SE 0.35)-0.20 (SE 0.36)Difference 0.99 (95% CI 0.34-1.65)p=0.003
ALSFRS-R change to week 8Secondary-2.33 (SE 0.43)-1.34 (SE 0.44)Difference 0.99 (95% CI 0.04-1.95)p=0.04
Slope of ALSFRS-R (points/week)SecondarySteeper declineShallower declineDiff -0.12 (95% CI -0.22 to -0.02)p=0.02
Plasma homocysteine change at week 16Secondary0.00 (SE 0.28) µmol/L-1.71 (SE 0.29) µmol/LDiff -1.71 (95% CI -2.23 to -1.20)p<0.001
FVC % changeSecondary-9.4 ± 1.8-7.4 ± 1.8Diff 2.0 (-1.9 to 5.8)p=0.31
Manual muscle test total scoreSecondary-3.7 ± 0.7-2.9 ± 0.7Diff 0.8 (-0.6 to 2.3)p=0.27
Norris scale total scoreSecondary-9.9 ± 1.5-7.0 ± 1.6Diff 2.9 (-0.5 to 6.3)p=0.10
Respiratory events / death (composite)Secondary00None occurred in 16 weeks
Total AEsAdverse42 (66%)40 (62%)Similar
Adverse drug reactionsAdverse1 (2%)5 (8%)Mostly injection-site related
Serious AEsAdverse2 (3%)1 (2%)None drug-related
AE leading to discontinuationAdverse00None
NasopharyngitisAdverse7 (11%)4 (6%)Common
Contusion at injection siteAdverse7 (11%)5 (8%)Injection-related
ConstipationAdverse4 (6%)3 (5%)Low
DeathsAdverse00None

Subgroup Analysis

In patients using concomitant riluzole (90% of cohort), LSM difference was 2.11 points (95% CI 0.46-3.76; p=0.01) — essentially identical to the full cohort, confirming additive benefit. Subgroups by onset site (bulbar, upper extremity, lower extremity) and ALS severity grade (1 vs 2) showed directionally consistent effects, though individual subgroup analyses were not formally powered. The 43% reduction in decline closely matches the 45% effect from post-hoc analysis of the prior phase 2/3 trial, supporting reproducibility in the early-stage moderate-progressor population.


Criticisms

  • Only Japanese patients — generalizability to non-Asian populations uncertain
  • Short 16-week treatment; survival benefit from the earlier trial (>600 days) was not replicated because this design had no event endpoints
  • Enriched enrollment restricts findings to moderate progressors (1-2 point drop over 12 weeks); unclear whether fast or slow progressors benefit
  • Homocysteine reduction confirms target engagement but did not correlate with ALSFRS-R change, leaving mechanism unclear
  • Open-label extension continues to 2024 — long-term durability data still maturing at publication
  • Primary analysis was 1-tailed at 2.5% — slightly less conservative than a 2-tailed 5% test; effect is still statistically significant either way

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED); Eisai Co, Ltd (investigational drug supply)

Based on: JETALS (JAMA Neurology, 2022)

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.