← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

EARLYSTIM

Neurostimulation for Parkinson's Disease with Early Motor Complications

Year of Publication: 2013

Authors: Schuepbach WMM, Rau J, Knudsen K, ..., for the EARLYSTIM Study Group

Journal: New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: N Engl J Med 2013;368:610-622

Link: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1205158


Clinical Question

Does bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation improve quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease and early motor complications compared to medical therapy alone?

Bottom Line

In patients with PD and early motor complications (mean disease duration 7.5 years), bilateral STN-DBS plus medical therapy was superior to medical therapy alone in improving quality of life (8.0-point between-group difference on PDQ-39, P=0.002), motor disability, levodopa-induced complications, and time with good mobility at 2 years, though with higher rate of serious adverse events including suicides.

Major Points

  • First randomized trial of DBS in early Parkinson's disease with motor complications (mean disease duration 7.5 years)
  • Neurostimulation improved PDQ-39 quality of life score by 7.8 points vs worsening of 0.2 points with medical therapy (P=0.002)
  • Off-medication UPDRS-III motor scores improved 16.4 points in DBS group vs favored neurostimulation (P<0.001)
  • Activities of daily living (UPDRS-II), levodopa-induced complications (UPDRS-IV), time with good mobility all significantly improved (P<0.001)
  • No significant differences in cognitive assessments (Mattis DRS) or emotional outcomes between groups
  • Serious adverse events more frequent in neurostimulation group (54.8% vs 44.1%); 26 events related to surgery/device
  • Two suicides in neurostimulation group vs one in medical therapy group
  • Levodopa-equivalent daily dose reduced by 39% in DBS group but increased by 21% in medical therapy group

Design

Study Type: Randomized controlled trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Blinded video assessments; expert raters unaware of study assignments except for rigidity assessment

Enrollment Period: July 2006 to November 2009

Follow-up Duration: 24 months

Centers: 17

Countries: Germany, France

Sample Size: 251

Analysis: Intention-to-treat (primary); per-protocol (secondary). Mixed-model analysis with baseline adjustment. Hochberg's procedure for sequential testing.


Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 to 60 years
  • Parkinson's disease duration of 4 years or more
  • Hoehn and Yahr stage ≤3 off-medication
  • Early motor complications (mean duration ~1.7 years)
  • ≥50% improvement with dopaminergic medication
  • No dementia (Mattis DRS score >130)
  • No major depression with suicidal thoughts (BDI-II ≤25)
  • No acute psychosis

Exclusion Criteria

  • Disease duration less than 4 years
  • Dementia (Mattis DRS score ≤130)
  • Major depression with suicidal thoughts (BDI-II >25)
  • Acute psychosis
  • Any medical/psychological problem interfering with study protocol

Arms

FieldControlNeurostimulation
InterventionOptimized pharmacological treatment according to EFNS guidelinesBilateral STN-DBS (electrodes model 3389, Medtronic; pulse generator Kinetra/Solterra) plus medical therapy
Duration24 months24 months

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
PDQ-39 summary index score (quality of life, 0-100, higher = worse)PrimaryWorsened by 0.2 points (-0.2±1.2)Improved by 7.8 points (7.8±1.2)0.002
UPDRS-II (activities of daily living) without medicationSecondaryMean±SE: 23±1.0Mean±SE: 9.5±1.0<0.001
UPDRS-III motor score, off medication (blinded assessment)SecondaryWorsened (mean change -1 to 0)Improved by 16.4 points<0.001
UPDRS-IV (levodopa-induced motor complications)SecondaryMean±SE: 0±0.5Mean±SE: 0.2±0.50.01
Time with good mobility and no troublesome dyskinesia (hours/day)SecondaryMean±SE: 1.0±0.8Significantly increased<0.001
Levodopa-equivalent daily doseSecondaryIncreased by 21%Reduced by 39%<0.001
Serious adverse events (total)Adverse56 (44.1%)68 (54.8%)
Death (all by suicide)Adverse1 (0.8%)2 (1.6%)
Event related to surgery or deviceAdverse026 (22 patients, 17.7%)
Worsening of mobilityAdverse11 (8.7%)5 (4.0%)
Motor fluctuationsAdverse7 (5.5%)0
DepressionAdverse1 (0.8%)6 (4.8%)
Suicide attemptAdverse2 (1.6%)2 (1.6%)

Subgroup Analysis

No formal subgroup analyses reported. Authors noted DBS may select patients with higher suicide risk.


Criticisms

  • Higher rate of serious adverse events in neurostimulation group (54.8% vs 44.1%)
  • Two suicides in neurostimulation group vs one in medical therapy group
  • Blinding was incomplete - patients knew their treatment assignment
  • Relatively young patient population (mean age 52 years) compared to typical advanced PD trials
  • Disease duration relatively short (7.5 years) with motor complications present for mean of only 1.7 years
  • Cannot exclude placebo effects or differences in medical management
  • Surgery-related complications occurred in 17.7% of neurostimulation patients

Funding

German Ministry of Research (Klinische Studies 01KG0502), French PHRC National (P050909), Medtronic

Based on: EARLYSTIM (New England Journal of Medicine, 2013)

Authors: Schuepbach WMM, Rau J, Knudsen K, ..., for the EARLYSTIM Study Group

Citation: N Engl J Med 2013;368:610-622

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.