← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

Erenumab CM-MO

Erenumab in chronic migraine with medication overuse: Subgroup analysis of a randomized trial

Year of Publication: 2019

Authors: Tepper SJ, Diener H-C, Ashina M, ..., Mikol DD

Journal: Neurology

Citation: Neurology 2019;92:e2309-e2320. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007497

Link: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007497


Clinical Question

Does erenumab reduce migraine frequency and acute medication use in chronic migraine patients with medication overuse?

Bottom Line

In patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse, erenumab 70 mg or 140 mg monthly approximately doubled the chance of ≥50% migraine-day reduction at 3 months (≈35% vs 18% placebo), cut monthly migraine days by ~6.6 days vs 3.5 with placebo, and meaningfully reduced acute migraine-specific medication days while improving disability and quality-of-life measures, supporting CGRP-receptor blockade as an effective preventive option in this hard-to-treat population.

Major Points

  • 274 of 667 randomized CM patients (41%) met medication overuse criteria; this subgroup had higher baseline MMD (19.0 vs 17.3) and more prior preventive failures (75% vs 63%).
  • At month 3, erenumab 70 mg and 140 mg both reduced MMD by −6.6 days vs −3.5 days with placebo in the medication-overuse subgroup (treatment difference −3.1 days, 95% CI −4.8 to −1.4).
  • ≥50% MMD responder rates in the medication-overuse subgroup: 36% (70 mg, OR 2.67 [1.36–5.22]) and 35% (140 mg, OR 2.51 [1.28–4.94]) vs 18% (placebo).
  • Acute migraine-specific medication days fell by −5.4 (70 mg) and −4.9 (140 mg) vs −2.1 days (placebo) in the medication-overuse subgroup.
  • Substantial transition from overuse to nonoveruse status at month 3 with erenumab, particularly for simple analgesics (60%/71% vs 52% placebo) and triptans (65%/54% vs 33% placebo).
  • HIT-6, MIDAS, and MSQ Role Function–Restrictive and Emotional Functioning scores improved beyond minimally important differences in both subgroups.
  • Effects in the medication-overuse subgroup were similar in magnitude to those in the non–medication-overuse subgroup; safety profile mirrored the parent trial.
  • Class II evidence that erenumab reduces MMD at 3 months in CM with medication overuse.

Design

Study Type: Preplanned subgroup analysis of a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in chronic migraine

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind (patient and investigator)

Allocation: 3:2:2 to placebo, erenumab 70 mg, or erenumab 140 mg; stratified by region (North America vs other) and medication overuse status (yes/no)

Follow-up Duration: 3-month double-blind treatment phase

Centers: 69

Countries:

Sample Size: 667

Analyzed: 667

Analysis: Intent-to-treat (≥1 dose plus ≥1 postbaseline eDiary measurement); generalized linear mixed model including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, region, and baseline value with first-order autoregressive covariance; p values not adjusted for multiple comparisons; medication-overuse-by-visit and PRO-by-overuse analyses were post hoc

Registration: NCT02066415


Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults with chronic migraine: ≥15 headache days/month with ≥8 migraine days/month
  • Medication overuse subgroup: ≥15 days/month simple analgesics (≥3 d/wk for ≥5 diary days each week), or ≥10 days/month triptans (≥2 d/wk), or ≥10 days/month combination therapy (≥3 d/wk)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Opioid overuse (>12 days during 3 months before screening or >4 days during baseline)
  • Use of migraine preventive drugs during the study or within 2 months before baseline

Arms

FieldControlErenumab 70 mgErenumab 140 mg
N286191190
InterventionSubcutaneous placebo monthlyErenumab 70 mg subcutaneous monthlyErenumab 140 mg subcutaneous monthly
Duration3 months3 months3 months

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD) at month 3 in patients with chronic migraine and medication overusePrimaryPlacebo: −3.5 days (95% CI −4.6 to −2.4)Erenumab 70 mg: −6.6 days (−8.0 to −5.3); Erenumab 140 mg: −6.6 days (−8.0 to −5.3)
Secondary18%Erenumab 70 mg: 36% (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.36–5.22); Erenumab 140 mg: 35% (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.28–4.94)
Secondary27%Erenumab 70 mg: 42% (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.17–3.23); Erenumab 140 mg: 46% (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.36–3.74)
Secondary−2.1 days (95% CI −3.0 to −1.2)Erenumab 70 mg: −5.4 (−6.5 to −4.4), difference −3.3 (−4.7 to −1.9); Erenumab 140 mg: −4.9 (−6.0 to −3.8), difference −2.8 (−4.2 to −1.4)
Secondary−1.2 days (95% CI −1.7 to −0.8)Erenumab 70 mg: −2.1 (−2.7 to −1.5), difference −0.9 (−1.6 to −0.1); Erenumab 140 mg: −3.6 (−4.2 to −3.0), difference −2.4 (−3.2 to −1.6)
SecondaryPlacebo: 23/44 (52%)70 mg: 15/25 (60%); 140 mg: 24/34 (71%)
SecondaryPlacebo: 42/127 (33%)70 mg: 61/94 (65%); 140 mg: 52/96 (54%)
SecondaryPlacebo: 70/176 (40%)70 mg: 47/105 (45%); 140 mg: 66/112 (59%)
Secondary
Secondary
Secondary
AE frequency similar across treatment groups and between medication-overuse and non–medication-overuse subgroupsSafety
Most AEs were mild or moderate in severitySafety
Most frequent AEs in erenumab-treated patients (≥2%): injection-site erythema, muscle spasms, migraine, injection-site pain, constipationSafety
Injection-site erythema, muscle spasms, migraine, injection-site pain, constipationAdverse
Most AEs mild to moderateAdverse

Subgroup Analysis

Treatment effects on MMD, ≥50% responder rate, acute medication days, HIT-6, MIDAS, and MSQ were similar in direction and magnitude in the non–medication-overuse subgroup, indicating consistent benefit regardless of baseline medication overuse status. Among patients who achieved nonoveruse by month 1, durability through month 3 was high: 86% (simple analgesics), 70% (triptans), and 63% (combination therapy).


Criticisms

  • Subgroup analysis with no adjustment of p values for multiple comparisons; some analyses (PROs by overuse subgroup, overuse-by-visit) were post hoc
  • Short 3-month double-blind phase limits assessment of durability and long-term safety
  • Patients on opioid overuse and those on concurrent preventives were excluded, limiting generalizability to a subset of real-world refractory CM patients
  • Industry-sponsored (Amgen) with multiple Amgen-employed authors

Funding

Amgen Inc.; the Article Processing Charge was funded by Amgen Inc.

Based on: Erenumab CM-MO (Neurology, 2019)

Authors: Tepper SJ, Diener H-C, Ashina M, ..., Mikol DD

Citation: Neurology 2019;92:e2309-e2320. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007497

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.