← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

Cannabidiol in Dravet Syndrome

Trial of Cannabidiol for Drug-Resistant Seizures in the Dravet Syndrome

Year of Publication: 2017

Authors: Orrin Devinsky, J. Helen Cross, Linda Laux, ..., for the Cannabidiol in Dravet Syndrome Study Group

Journal: New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: N Engl J Med 2017;376:2011-20

Link: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611618

PDF: https://dravet.ch/wp-content/uploads/201...-J-Med-2017.pdf


Clinical Question

Does cannabidiol reduce drug-resistant seizures in children and young adults with Dravet syndrome compared to placebo?

Bottom Line

Among patients with Dravet syndrome, cannabidiol resulted in a greater reduction in convulsive-seizure frequency than placebo (median reduction 38.9% vs 13.3%, P=0.01) and was associated with higher rates of adverse events including somnolence, elevated liver enzymes, diarrhea, vomiting, and fatigue.

Major Points

  • First randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cannabidiol for Dravet syndrome
  • 120 children and young adults (ages 2-18) with drug-resistant Dravet syndrome were randomized 1:1 to cannabidiol 20 mg/kg/day or placebo
  • Trial consisted of 4-week baseline, 14-week treatment period (2-week titration + 12-week maintenance), 10-day taper, and 4-week safety follow-up
  • Median convulsive seizure frequency decreased from 12.4 to 5.9 per month with cannabidiol vs 14.9 to 14.1 with placebo
  • Adjusted median difference in seizure reduction: -22.8 percentage points (95% CI, -41.1 to -5.4; P=0.01)
  • 43% of cannabidiol patients achieved ≥50% seizure reduction vs 27% with placebo (OR 2.00, P=0.08)
  • 5% of cannabidiol patients became seizure-free vs 0% with placebo (P=0.08)
  • 62% of caregivers reported overall condition improvement with cannabidiol vs 34% with placebo (P=0.02)
  • Total seizures (all types) significantly reduced with cannabidiol (P=0.03), but no significant reduction in nonconvulsive seizures alone
  • More withdrawals in cannabidiol group (9/61, 15%) vs placebo (3/59, 5%)
  • Common adverse events: diarrhea (31%), somnolence (36%), decreased appetite (28%), vomiting (15%), fatigue (20%)
  • Elevated liver enzymes occurred in 12 cannabidiol patients vs 1 placebo patient, all taking valproate
  • Three patients discontinued due to elevated aminotransferases in cannabidiol group
  • 90% of patients completed treatment period; 105/108 entered open-label extension

Design

Study Type: Multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind (patients, caregivers, investigators). Matching placebo solution identical except for absence of cannabidiol.

Enrollment Period: Not specified

Follow-up Duration: 14-week treatment period plus 10-day taper plus 4-week safety follow-up

Centers: 23

Countries: United States, Europe

Sample Size: 120

Analysis: Intention-to-treat analysis. Primary endpoint analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Hodges-Lehmann approach for median difference estimate. Sample size provided 80% power to detect 32 percentage point difference with SD of 56% and two-sided significance of 5%. Randomization 1:1, centrally held. Secondary endpoints: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for responder rates, ordinal logistic regression for CGIC and seizure duration changes, ANCOVA for other continuous variables. No P-value adjustments for multiple comparisons on secondary endpoints.


Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 2 to 18 years
  • Established diagnosis of Dravet syndrome (independently reviewed by panel)
  • Taking one or more antiepileptic drugs at stable doses
  • Had 4 or more convulsive seizures during 28-day baseline period
  • All medications/interventions for epilepsy (including ketogenic diet and vagus nerve stimulation) stable for 4 weeks before screening and to remain unchanged throughout trial

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients receiving phenytoin, phenobarbital, or metabolites of these drugs (due to potential drug-drug interactions)
  • Received vigabatrin within past year
  • Received felbamate for less than 18 continuous months
  • Used intermittent rescue benzodiazepines more than once per month within past month
  • Did not meet all inclusion criteria during baseline period

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicCannabidiol (n=61)Placebo (n=59)
Age, years, mean (SD)9.7 (4.7)9.8 (4.8)
Age, years, median (range)9.1 (2.5-18.0)9.2 (2.3-18.4)
Sex - Female26 (43%)32 (54%)
Sex - Male35 (57%)27 (46%)
Geographic region - United States35 (57%)37 (63%)
Geographic region - Rest of world26 (43%)22 (37%)
Body-mass index at baseline18.3 (4.5)19.1 (4.7)
No. of previous antiepileptic drugs4.6 (4.3)4.6 (3.3)
No. of concomitant antiepileptic drugs3.0 (1.0)2.9 (1.0)
Clobazam40 (66%)38 (64%)
Valproate, all forms37 (61%)34 (58%)
Stiripentol30 (49%)21 (36%)
Levetiracetam16 (26%)17 (29%)
Topiramate16 (26%)15 (25%)
Ketogenic diet6 (10%)4 (7%)
Vagus-nerve stimulation6 (10%)9 (15%)
Baseline convulsive seizures per month, median (range)12.4 (3.9-1717)14.9 (3.7-718)
Most common convulsive seizure type - Generalized tonic-clonic78%
Nonconvulsive seizures37 (61%)41 (69%)
Developmental delayPresent in most patients, severe/profound in 48%

Arms

FieldCannabidiolControl
InterventionCannabidiol oral solution 20 mg/kg/day administered twice daily in addition to stable antiepileptic drug regimens. Solution contained 100 mg cannabidiol per mL. Dose escalated over 14 days using approved regimen. Tapered 10% per day over 10 days at end of treatment.Matching placebo solution identical to cannabidiol solution except for absence of cannabidiol, administered twice daily in equivalent volume in addition to stable antiepileptic drug regimens. Tapered 10% per day over 10 days at end of treatment.
Duration14 weeks treatment (2 weeks titration + 12 weeks maintenance)14 weeks treatment (2 weeks titration + 12 weeks maintenance)

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Percentage change per 28 days from 4-week baseline period in convulsive-seizure frequency during 14-week treatment periodPrimaryMedian change -13.3% (IQR -52.5 to 20.2). Median frequency decreased from 14.9 to 14.1 seizures per month.Median change -38.9% (IQR -69.5 to -4.8). Median frequency decreased from 12.4 to 5.9 seizures per month.25.60%0.01
≥50% reduction in convulsive seizures (key secondary endpoint)Secondary16 patients (27%)26 patients (43%)2.00 (95% CI 0.93 to 4.30)0.08
100% seizure reduction (seizure freedom)Secondary0 patients (0%)3 patients (5%)Odds ratio not calculable0.08
≥25% reduction in convulsive seizuresSecondary26 patients38 patients2.10 (95% CI 1.01 to 4.35)0.05
≥75% reduction in convulsive seizuresSecondary7 patients14 patients2.21 (95% CI 0.82 to 5.95)0.11
Total seizures (all types) - percentage change from baselineSecondaryMedian frequency decreased from 41.5 to 31.1 (adjusted reduction 9.0%)Median frequency decreased from 24.0 to 13.7 (adjusted reduction 28.6%)Adjusted median difference -19.2 percentage points (95% CI -39.25 to -1.17)0.03
Nonconvulsive seizures - percentage change from baselineSecondaryAdjusted median difference 0.00 (95% CI -21.36 to 31.59)0.88
Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC) - improvement in overall conditionSecondary20 of 58 caregivers (34%)37 of 60 caregivers (62%)Change from baseline in CGIC score: -1.0 (95% CI -1.0 to 0.0)0.02
Sleep disruption score (0-10 scale)SecondaryAdjusted mean difference -0.4 (95% CI -1.5 to 0.7)0.45
Epworth Sleepiness Scale scoreSecondaryAdjusted mean difference 1.5 (95% CI -0.2 to 3.2)0.08
Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy scoreSecondaryAdjusted mean difference 1.5 (95% CI -3.8 to 6.8)0.58
Vineland-II adaptive behavior scoreSecondaryAdjusted mean difference -2.6 (95% CI -6.8 to 1.6)0.21
Use of rescue medicationSecondary41 patients (69%)36 patients (59%)
Reduction in duration of tonic-clonic seizuresSecondary2.48 (95% CI 0.94 to 6.51)0.07
Any TEAEAdverse44 patients (75%)57 patients (93%)
Mild or moderate TEAEs (among those with AEs)Adverse95%84%
TEAEs related to trial agent (among those with AEs)Adverse36%75%
Serious adverse eventsAdverse3 patients (5%)10 patients (16%)
TEAEs leading to withdrawalAdverse1 patient8 patients
TEAEs leading to dose reductionAdverse10 patients
DiarrheaAdverse6 (10%)19 (31%)
VomitingAdverse3 (5%)9 (15%)
FatigueAdverse2 (3%)12 (20%)
PyrexiaAdverse5 (8%)9 (15%)
Upper respiratory tract infectionAdverse5 (8%)7 (11%)
Decreased appetiteAdverse3 (5%)17 (28%)
ConvulsionAdverse3 (5%)7 (11%)
LethargyAdverse3 (5%)8 (13%)
SomnolenceAdverse6 (10%)22 (36%), of which 18/22 were taking clobazam
Status epilepticusAdverse3 patients3 patients (none led to withdrawal, none deemed related to trial agent)
Elevated liver aminotransferases (ALT or AST >3x ULN)Adverse1 patient12 patients (all taking valproate); 3 led to withdrawal
DeathsAdverse00
Suicidal ideation (Columbia Scale)Adverse0 (among 77 who completed questionnaire)0 (among 77 who completed questionnaire)

Subgroup Analysis

Somnolence occurred more frequently in patients taking clobazam (18/22 in cannabidiol group, 5/6 in placebo group). Post hoc analysis showed no relationship between somnolence and treatment effect. All patients with elevated aminotransferases were taking valproate, suggesting drug interaction. In 9 cases where patient continued in trial, enzyme levels normalized while continuing cannabidiol. First occurrence of adverse events most commonly during 14-day dose escalation period in both groups. After dose reduction, adverse events resolved completely in 8/10 cannabidiol patients and partially in 1. Difference in first month of maintenance period showed median convulsive seizures declined from 12.4 to 5.0 in cannabidiol vs 14.9 to 13.0 in placebo (P=0.002).


Criticisms

  • Partially subjective primary endpoint (caregiver-reported seizures) could be affected by unblinding due to side effects
  • Higher rate of adverse events in cannabidiol group may have unblinded some patients/caregivers
  • Differences in palatability between active treatment and placebo could have affected blinding
  • Short treatment duration (14 weeks) limits assessment of long-term efficacy and safety
  • No data on nonconvulsive seizure reduction, which was not significant - unclear if this represents lack of efficacy or difficulty in counting by parents in developmentally delayed children
  • Higher withdrawal rate in cannabidiol group (15% vs 5%) may affect interpretation
  • Drug interactions with concomitant medications (especially valproate and clobazam) complicate safety profile
  • Applicability of Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale unclear in population with cognitive impairment
  • Study population highly selected with severe, treatment-resistant epilepsy - may not generalize to all Dravet syndrome patients
  • No active comparator - only compared to placebo
  • No P-value adjustments for multiple secondary endpoints
  • Median baseline seizure frequency higher in placebo group (14.9 vs 12.4), though not statistically significant

Funding

GW Pharmaceuticals

Based on: Cannabidiol in Dravet Syndrome (New England Journal of Medicine, 2017)

Authors: Orrin Devinsky, J. Helen Cross, Linda Laux, ..., for the Cannabidiol in Dravet Syndrome Study Group

Citation: N Engl J Med 2017;376:2011-20

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.