AAN/AES/SMFM Guideline: ASM Teratogenesis, Perinatal & Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Pregnancy (2024)

This topic summarizes the 2024 AAN/AES/SMFM practice guideline on anti-seizure medication (ASM) use during pregnancy, covering teratogenesis, perinatal outcomes, neurodevelopmental effects, and folic acid supplementation. Published in Neurology 2024;102:e209279, this guideline updates the 2009 AAN practice parameter based on a systematic review of 82 articles through August 2022.

🔹 Bottom Line

  • Guideline: AAN/AES/SMFM 2024 practice guideline — 82 included articles (69 from 2009 review + 13 new); systematic review through August 2022
  • Valproic acid has the highest MCM rate in monotherapy (9.7% prevalence per 1,000) — must be avoided in PWECP to reduce MCMs, NTDs, poor neurodevelopmental outcomes, and SGA risk (Level A)
  • Safest ASMs (lowest MCM rates): Lamotrigine (3.1%), levetiracetam (3.5%), and oxcarbazepine (3.1%) in monotherapy → must consider these in PWECP (Level A)
  • Valproic acid → lowest IQ: Full-scale IQ 93.9 (reference) vs lamotrigine 105.8, levetiracetam 99.0, carbamazepine 100.4 — likely associated with decreased IQ and increased ASD risk (Level A)
  • Phenobarbital: Highest cardiac malformation rate (4.4%) — must avoid to reduce cardiac MCMs (Level A)
  • Topiramate: Avoid in PWECP — associated with oral clefts (1.4%) and SGA risk (Level B)
  • Folic acid ≥0.4 mg/d: Must prescribe preconceptionally and during pregnancy to reduce NTDs and possibly improve neurodevelopmental outcomes (Level A/B)
  • Seizure control is paramount: Minimize convulsive seizures (GTC/FBTC) during pregnancy — mortality risk 5–12× greater in PWECP (Level A)
  • Exercise caution in removing/replacing an ASM effective for GTC/FBTC once PWECP is already pregnant (Level B)
  • Monitor ASM levels throughout pregnancy; lamotrigine and levetiracetam concentrations decrease during pregnancy (Level B)

Guideline Overview

Source & Scope

  • Organizations: American Academy of Neurology (AAN), American Epilepsy Society (AES), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
  • Published: Neurology 2024;102:e209279 (June 11, 2024)
  • Lead author: Alison M. Pack, MD, MPH (Columbia University)
  • Updates: 2009 AAN practice parameter on women with epilepsy & pregnancy
  • Evidence base: 82 total articles (50 initial + 13 update + 19 from 2009 guideline); Class IV studies excluded (n = 133)
  • Population: People with epilepsy of childbearing potential (PWECP) — gender-neutral terminology adopted
  • Process: AAN 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual; modified GRADE methodology

Four Clinical Questions Addressed

  1. Prevalence of MCMs by specific ASMs (monotherapy vs polytherapy, high vs low doses)?
  2. Prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes by specific ASMs?
  3. Prevalence of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes by specific ASMs?
  4. Effect of folic acid on MCMs, perinatal outcomes, and neurodevelopmental outcomes?

Key Terminology

  • PWECP: People with epilepsy of childbearing potential
  • MCM: Major congenital malformation
  • NTD: Neural tube defect
  • SGA: Small for gestational age
  • ASD: Autism spectrum disorder
  • RMD: Raw mean difference (for IQ comparisons)
  • PD: Prevalence difference; PR: Prevalence ratio

🔹 Clinical Pearl

The 2024 guideline uses PWECP (people with epilepsy of childbearing potential) instead of the 2009 term “women with epilepsy” — reflecting gender-inclusive language. The guideline emphasizes that >65% of pregnancies in PWECP are unintended, making preconceptional counseling critical at every visit.

Recommendation 1: General Principles

Recommendation 1 Statements

StatementRecommendationLevel
1AClinicians should engage in joint decision-making with PWECP, taking individual preferences into account when selecting ASMs and monitoring dosingB
1BWhen treating PWECP, clinicians should recommend ASMs and doses that optimize both seizure control and fetal outcomes at the earliest possible opportunity preconceptionally (e.g., at time of starting an ASM post-menarche)B

Recommendation 1 Rationale

  • In utero ASM exposure may be associated with increased risk to fetus
  • Discontinuing or changing ASMs also carries risks (seizure recurrence)
  • Shared decision-making leads to more informed choices and better risk perception
  • >65% of pregnancies in PWECP in the US are unintended
  • The ASM regimen at time of conception is often the regimen used throughout pregnancy

Recommendation 2: Seizure Control During Pregnancy

Recommendation 2 Statements

StatementRecommendationLevel
2AClinicians must minimize convulsive seizures (GTC and focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic) in PWECP during pregnancy to minimize potential risks to the birth parent and fetusA
2BOnce PWECP is already pregnant, clinicians should exercise caution in removing or replacing an ASM effective for GTC/FBTC, even if not optimal for fetus (e.g., valproic acid)B
2CMonitor ASM levels in PWECP throughout pregnancy as guided by individual ASM pharmacokinetics and patient clinical presentationB
2DAdjust ASM dose during pregnancy in response to (1) decreasing serum ASM levels or (2) worsening seizure controlB
2ECounsel PWECP using understudied ASMs (acetazolamide, eslicarbazepine, ethosuximide, lacosamide, nitrazepam, perampanel, piracetam, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, vigabatrin) that limited data existB

Recommendation 2 Rationale

  • Mortality: Odds of mortality during pregnancy 5–12× greater in PWECP vs pregnant people without epilepsy
  • Danish cohort (>2 million pregnancies) and US cohort (>20 million participants) confirm this elevated mortality risk
  • 202 pregnancy-related deaths in epilepsy in the UK (2013–2015); most were from sudden unexpected death; 5 of 13 had stopped ASMs during pregnancy
  • All 13 epilepsy-related deaths had pre-pregnancy uncontrolled seizures
  • EURAP data: No statistical association between seizures and spontaneous abortion/stillbirth, but 1 stillbirth followed convulsive status epilepticus
  • Frequency of GTC/FBTC seizures may be a risk factor for lower IQ in offspring
  • Serum concentrations of lamotrigine and levetiracetam decrease during pregnancy → may need dose adjustment
  • Valproic acid is one of the most effective ASMs for idiopathic generalized epilepsy; switching during pregnancy doubles seizure risk (EURAP data)

🔹 Clinical Pearl

Never abruptly stop valproic acid during pregnancy in a patient with GTC/FBTC seizures. EURAP data show that removing VPA and replacing with another ASM during pregnancy doubled the risk of GTC/FBTC seizures. Preconceptional optimization is key — once pregnant, exercise caution before changing effective therapy.

Recommendation 3: Major Congenital Malformations (MCMs)

Background

  • Unadjusted birth prevalence of any MCM in the general population: approximately 2.4%–2.9%
  • ASMs with sufficient data for reliable conclusions (>1,000 monotherapy exposures): lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, carbamazepine, valproic acid, phenobarbital, phenytoin, topiramate
  • Lowest MCM prevalence (monotherapy): Levetiracetam (3.1%), oxcarbazepine (3.1%), lamotrigine (3.1%)
  • Highest MCM prevalence (monotherapy): Valproic acid (9.7%)

Table: MCM Prevalence per 1,000 by ASM in Monotherapy

ASMSample SizeMCM Prevalence per 1,000 (95% CI)
Levetiracetam2,24834.8 (19.5–54.3)77.8
Oxcarbazepine1,03631.3 (21.6–42.8)0.0
Lamotrigine10,74630.7 (25.4–36.4)49.4
Gabapentin9030.9 (5.5–76.1)0.0
Clonazepam18730.3 (7.4–67.8)26.5
Clobazam6431.3 (0.5–91.9)0
Zonisamide11639.2 (11.7–236.1)87.7
Carbamazepine9,90843.7 (35.7–52.6)69.6
Topiramate74844.5 (30.9–60.4)0.0
Phenytoin1,60451.3 (35.9–69.2)52.3
Phenobarbital1,11660.3 (47.1–75.0)0.0
Valproic acid5,65896.7 (80.4–114.2)67.0
Primidone99101.5 (50.4–167.7)0.0

MCM Prevalence Differences vs Reference (Valproic Acid)

ASM (Monotherapy)MCM per 1,000Difference vs VPA per 1,000 (95% CI)Confidence
Carbamazepine43.7−53 (−71.9 to −34.1) significantModerate
Lamotrigine30.7−66 (−83.8 to −48.2) significantModerate
Levetiracetam34.8−61.9 (−86.2 to −37.6) significantModerate
Oxcarbazepine31.3−65.4 (−85.3 to −45.5) significantModerate
Phenobarbital60.3−36.4 (−58.3 to −14.5) significantLow
Phenytoin51.3−45.4 (−69.1 to −21.7) significantLow
Topiramate44.5−52.2 (−74.6 to −29.8) significantModerate

Specific MCM Types by ASM (Monotherapy, Prevalence per 1,000)

MCM TypeHighest-Risk ASMPrevalence per 1,000 (95% CI)Notes
Neural tube defectsValproic acid14.3 (9.5–20.1)Reference; highest NTD rate of all ASMs
Neural tube defectsCarbamazepine5.6 (2.6–9.7)PD −8.7 (−15.1 to −2.3); moderate confidence
Neural tube defectsLamotrigine3.4 (0.4–9.2)PD −11.0 (−17.8 to −4.1); moderate confidence
Neural tube defectsLevetiracetam3.1 (0.2–9.3)PD −11.3 (−18.3 to −4.2); moderate confidence
Cardiac malformationsPhenobarbital41.9 (25.1–62.7)Reference; highest cardiac MCM rate
Cardiac malformationsLamotrigine16.6 (7.8–28.5)PD −25.3 (−46.8 to −3.8); moderate confidence
Cardiac malformationsLevetiracetam12.5 (0.1–53.4)PD −29.4 (−62.0 to 3.2); low confidence
Cardiac malformationsValproic acid25.1 (16.9–35.0)PD −16.8 (−37.6 to 4.1); low confidence
Oral/cleft palatePhenobarbital22.3 (7.1–45.6)Reference; highest rate
Oral/cleft palateTopiramate14.1 (7.3–23.1)PD −8.2 (−29.0 to 12.6); low confidence
Oral/cleft palateValproic acid8.0 (4.6–12.2)PD −14.3 (−34.0 to 5.3); low confidence
UrogenitalValproic acid12.4 (7.4–18.8)Reference; highest urogenital MCM rate
RenalValproic acid13.7 (8.6–19.9)Reference; highest renal MCM rate

Recommendation 3 Statements

StatementRecommendationLevel
3ACounsel PWECP that birth prevalence of any MCM in the general population is approximately 2.4%–2.9%, providing a comparison framework for individual riskA
3BMust consider using lamotrigine, levetiracetam, or oxcarbazepine in PWECP when appropriate based on epilepsy syndrome, likelihood of seizure control, and comorbidities to minimize MCM riskA
3CMust avoid valproic acid in PWECP to minimize risk of MCMs (composite) or NTDs, if clinically feasibleA
3DMust counsel PWECP treated with or considering valproic acid that the risk of any MCM is the highest with VPA compared with other studied ASMsA
3ETo reduce cardiac malformation risk, must avoid phenobarbital in PWECP, if clinically feasibleA
3FTo reduce oral cleft risk, clinicians should avoid phenobarbital and topiramate in PWECP, if clinically feasibleB
3GTo reduce urogenital and renal malformation risk, should avoid valproic acid in PWECP, if clinically feasibleB
3HObstetricians should recommend fetal screening for MCMs (e.g., detailed anatomical ultrasound) for PWECP treated with any ASM during pregnancyB
3IObstetricians should recommend screening cardiac investigations of the fetus among PWECP treated with phenobarbital during pregnancyB

🔹 Clinical Pearl

For board exams, know the “Big Three Safe ASMs” in pregnancy: lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine — all have MCM rates of ~3.1% (close to the general population baseline of 2.4–2.9%). Valproic acid at 9.7% is ~3× the background rate. Phenobarbital is the worst for cardiac malformations (4.4%). VPA is the worst for NTDs (1.4%), urogenital (1.2%), and renal (1.4%) malformations.

Dose-Dependent MCM Risk

Key Findings

  • Pre-planned analyses from external comparisons did not reach sufficient evidence for a standalone dose recommendation
  • The only Class I study addressing dose-response was EURAP, which demonstrated a dose effect for:
    • Carbamazepine
    • Lamotrigine
    • Phenobarbital
    • Valproic acid
  • A statistically and clinically important difference in MCM prevalence was found for valproic acid and phenobarbital between high- and low-dose exposures
  • Reasonable practice: Use the lowest appropriate dose of ASMs in PWECP to reduce MCM risk, if clinically feasible

Polytherapy vs Monotherapy

ASMMono MCM/1,000 (95% CI)Poly MCM/1,000 (95% CI)PD Mono vs Poly (95% CI)
Carbamazepine43.7 (35.7–52.6)58.6 (38.8–82.1)−14.9 (−38.1 to 8.3); low confidence
Lamotrigine30.7 (25.4–36.4)44.6 (34.1–56.5)−13.9 (−26.4 to −1.4); low confidence
Levetiracetam34.8 (19.5–54.3)64.5 (30.1–110.8)−29.7 (−73.7 to 14.2); low confidence
Oxcarbazepine31.3 (21.6–42.8)48.9 (26.2–78.2)−17.6 (−45.7 to 10.5); low confidence
Phenobarbital60.3 (47.1–75.0)43.4 (24.4–67.5)+16.9 (−8.8 to 42.6); low confidence
Phenytoin51.3 (35.9–69.2)38.0 (19.8–61.7)+13.3 (−13.4 to 40.1); low confidence
Valproic acid96.7 (80.4–114.2)101.7 (81.0–124.5)−5.1 (−32.6 to 22.5); low confidence

🔹 Clinical Pearl

There is no clear evidence that polytherapy is worse than monotherapy for MCMs when comparing the same ASMs — most differences are small with wide confidence intervals. The key driver of MCM risk is the specific ASM used (especially valproic acid) rather than mono- vs polytherapy per se.

Recommendation 4: Perinatal Outcomes

Intrauterine Death

  • Prevalence of intrauterine death is highly likely not to differ across ASMs in monotherapy
  • Risk of intrauterine death is likely higher with polytherapy vs monotherapy

Prematurity

  • Prevalence of prematurity is possibly no different across ASMs used in monotherapy

Small for Gestational Age (SGA) — Table 7 Data

ASM (Monotherapy)Sample SizeSGA Prevalence per 1,000 (95% CI)Difference vs Reference (95% CI)
Phenytoin46414.4 (2.7–35.1)−65.8 (−206.3 to 74.8); low confidence
Zonisamide12520.4 (3.1–52.4)−59.7 (−201.6 to 82.1); low confidence
Levetiracetam83552.9 (6.8–138.6)−27.3 (−181.7 to 127.1); low confidence
Oxcarbazepine1,04558.0 (6.8–154.2)−22.2 (−180.1 to 135.7); low confidence
Gabapentin22558.5 (0.1–214.2)−21.7 (−197.7 to 154.3); low confidence
Carbamazepine3,03375.7 (31.3–137.5)−4.4 (−153.9 to 145.0); low confidence
Topiramate45380.2 (0.3–279.6)Reference
Lamotrigine2,59785.1 (13.6–209.6)5.0 (−165.7 to 175.6); low confidence
Phenobarbital27489.3 (0.3–310.0)9.1 (−199.4 to 217.6); low confidence
Primidone20166.0 (40.7–352.9)85.8 (−123.6 to 295.2); very low confidence
Valproic acid1,829147.1 (53.9–276.0)66.9 (−111.5 to 245.4); low confidence
Clobazam30177.1 (64.6–329.9)96.9 (−95.7 to 289.6); very low confidence
Clonazepam276165.4 (123.0–212.7)85.2 (−61.5 to 231.9); low confidence

Recommendation 4 Statements

StatementRecommendationLevel
4ACounsel PWECP that prevalence of intrauterine death does not differ among different ASM exposures in monotherapyB
4BClinicians should avoid valproic acid or topiramate in PWECP to minimize risk of offspring being born SGA, if clinically feasibleB
4CTo enable early identification of fetal growth restriction, obstetricians should recommend screening fetal growth throughout pregnancy among PWECP treated with valproic acid or topiramateB
  • SGA prevalence is possibly greater after exposure to valproic acid or topiramate compared with lamotrigine
  • Fetal growth restriction increases risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality
  • Prenatal identification of SGA leads to improved perinatal outcomes by informing timely delivery

Recommendation 5: Neurodevelopmental Outcomes

Full-Scale IQ (Table 4 — Global IQ by ASM Monotherapy)

ASMSample SizeMean Global IQ (95% CI)RMD vs VPA Reference (95% CI)Confidence
Lamotrigine129105.8 (100.9–110.6)+11.85 (5.53–18.15)Moderate (upgraded for magnitude)
Phenytoin76103.2 (93.0–113.4)+9.29 (−1.63 to 20.21)Very low
Carbamazepine316100.4 (95.8–105.1)+6.53 (0.39–12.67)Low
Topiramate27100.5 (95.8–105.2)+6.58 (0.37–12.80)Very low
Levetiracetam4299.0 (95.0–103.0)+6.3 (0.9–11.7)Very low
Valproic acid17393.9 (89.1–97.9)ReferenceReference

Verbal IQ (Table 5)

ASMSample SizeMean Verbal IQ (95% CI)RMD vs VPA (95% CI)Confidence
Lamotrigine103102.4 (96.5–108.2)+10.3 (2.4–18.2)Moderate (upgraded)
Phenytoin61103.0 (95.8–110.2)+10.9 (2.0–19.8)Moderate (upgraded)
Levetiracetam42101.0 (97.7–104.3)+8.9 (2.7–15.1)Very low
Carbamazepine28398.4 (94.6–102.2)+6.3 (−0.2 to 12.8)Low
Topiramate2799.2 (95.2–103.2)+7.1 (0.5–13.7)Very low
Valproic acid16092.1 (86.9–97.4)ReferenceReference

Non-Verbal IQ (Table 5)

ASMSample SizeMean Non-Verbal IQ (95% CI)RMD vs VPA (95% CI)Confidence
Phenytoin40106.0 (103.1–109.0)+4.8 (0.1–8.7)Very low
Lamotrigine103105.8 (100.9–110.7)+4.6 (−0.8 to 10.1)Low
Carbamazepine197104.7 (102.2–107.3)+3.6 (0.0–7.1)Low
Topiramate27102.4 (97.1–107.7)+1.2 (−4.6 to 7.1)Very low
Levetiracetam4299.6 (95.5–103.7)−1.6 (−6.3 to 3.2)Very low
Valproic acid96101.2 (98.7–103.6)ReferenceReference

Autism Spectrum Disorder / Autistic Traits (Table 6)

ASM (Monotherapy)Sample SizeASD/Autistic Traits per 1,000 (95% CI)Difference vs VPA (95% CI)Confidence
Levetiracetam1,22611.3 (2.9–25.1)−30.6 (−45.4 to −15.8)Moderate (upgraded for magnitude)
Lamotrigine7,56814.5 (8.6–22.2)−27.4 (−39.3 to −15.6)Moderate (upgraded for magnitude)
Carbamazepine4,49317.1 (6.2–33.1)−24.9 (−41.5 to −8.2)Moderate (upgraded for magnitude)
Clonazepam58720.8 (7.5–40.7)−21.1 (−40.4 to −1.8)Moderate (upgraded for magnitude)
Oxcarbazepine32123.3 (9.7–42.6)−18.6 (−37.8 to 0.5)Low
Valproic acid3,39941.9 (32.7–52.3)ReferenceReference

Recommendation 5 Statements

StatementRecommendationLevel
5ATo reduce risk of poor neurodevelopmental outcomes, including ASD and lower IQ, clinicians must avoid valproic acid in PWECP, if clinically feasibleA
5BMust counsel PWECP treated with or considering valproic acid that in utero exposure is likely or possibly associated with a decrease in full-scale, verbal, and non-verbal IQ compared with other studied ASMs (CBZ, GBP, LTG, LEV, PHT, TPM)A
5CMust counsel PWECP treated with or considering valproic acid that in utero exposure is possibly associated with an increased risk of ASD compared with other studied ASMs (CBZ, CZP, LEV, LTG)A
5DClinicians should implement age-appropriate developmental screening in children exposed to any ASM in utero born to PWECPB

Key Neurodevelopmental Summary

  • Valproic acid: Lowest mean IQ (93.9) — likely associated with decreased IQ at age 6 compared with gabapentin and lamotrigine; possibly decreased vs carbamazepine, levetiracetam, and topiramate
  • Lamotrigine: Highest mean IQ (105.8); RMD vs VPA = +11.85 points (moderate confidence, upgraded for large magnitude of effect)
  • ASD risk: VPA has the highest ASD/autistic trait prevalence (41.9/1,000); levetiracetam (11.3/1,000), lamotrigine (14.5/1,000), carbamazepine (17.1/1,000), and clonazepam (20.8/1,000) all show statistically significantly lower rates
  • Topiramate concern: Although pre-planned analysis was insufficient, the SCAN-AED study found even higher ASD and intellectual disability prevalence with topiramate than VPA (aHRs: 2.8 [95% CI 1.4–5.7] for ASD and 3.5 [95% CI 1.4–8.6] for intellectual disability)

🔹 Clinical Pearl

Valproic acid exposure in utero → ~12-point IQ deficit compared with lamotrigine (93.9 vs 105.8; RMD +11.85, moderate confidence). It is also associated with the highest ASD risk (41.9/1,000) — nearly 3× that of lamotrigine (14.5/1,000). These neurodevelopmental effects are the strongest argument for avoiding VPA in PWECP, even more than the MCM data.

Recommendation 6: Folic Acid Supplementation

Recommendation 6 Rationale

  • Optimal dosing and timing of folic acid supplementation in PWECP are unknown
  • No demonstrated benefit of folic acid supplementation (≥0.4 mg/d) specifically for MCM prevention in PWECP
  • However, randomized trials in the general population (pre-US folic acid fortification) demonstrated that periconceptional multivitamin supplementation reduces NTDs
  • Systematic review of 14 studies: folic acid supplementation of 0.2 mg/d (on top of US fortification levels) would reduce NTDs by 23%
  • Protective effect greatest in those with initial low serum folate concentrations
  • Neurodevelopmental benefits:
    • Preconception folic acid → possibly associated with better neurodevelopmental outcomes in children born to PWECP
    • Folic acid ≥0.4 mg/d → possibly associated with reduced autistic traits at 3 years (OR 7.9, 95% CI 2.5–24.9)
    • Likely associated with higher global IQ (average 6 points) at age 6 in children born to PWECP exposed to ASMs in utero
  • Caution with high-dose folic acid:
    • Periconceptional folic acid >1 mg/d was associated with 0.9% absolute increase in childhood cancer before age 20 (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2–6.3)
    • Sub-analysis restricted to maternal epilepsy + folic acid <3 mg/d was not significant (aHR 2.6, 95% CI 1.0–6.9)
    • Very high maternal serum folate (≥60.3 nmol/L) at birth → 2.5× increased ASD risk (95% CI 1.3–4.6)
  • Adherence to folic acid supplementation is generally poor among PWECP; ASM polytherapy further decreases adherence
  • No high-dose folic acid formulation exists in the US → higher doses require multiple tablets, reducing adherence

Recommendation 6 Statements

StatementRecommendationLevel
6AClinicians should prescribe at least 0.4 mg of folic acid daily preconceptionally and during pregnancy to any PWECP treated with an ASM to decrease the risk of NTDs in the offspringB
6BClinicians must prescribe at least 0.4 mg of folic acid daily preconceptionally and during pregnancy to any PWECP treated with an ASM to possibly improve neurodevelopmental outcomes such as ASD and global IQ in the offspringA
6CClinicians should counsel PWECP treated with an ASM that adherence to recommended folic acid supplementation preconceptionally and during pregnancy is important to minimize MCM and neurodevelopmental riskB

🔹 Clinical Pearl

The recommended folic acid dose is ≥0.4 mg/d (not the commonly cited 4–5 mg/d from older guidelines). This guideline found no demonstrated MCM reduction from folic acid in PWECP specifically, but Level A evidence supports it for neurodevelopmental benefit (higher IQ, reduced ASD risk). Paradoxically, very high folate levels may increase ASD risk — balance is key. Data do not support a dose recommendation beyond 0.4 mg/d.

Drug-by-Drug Quick Reference

Comprehensive ASM Pregnancy Risk Summary

ASMAny MCM /1,000Key Specific MCM RisksIQ (Mean)ASD /1,000SGA /1,000Guideline Action
Lamotrigine30.7NTD 3.4; Cardiac 16.6; Oral cleft 4.6105.814.585.1Consider (Level A)
Levetiracetam34.8NTD 3.1; Cardiac 12.5; Urogenital 1.099.011.352.9Consider (Level A)
Oxcarbazepine31.3NTD 3.5; cardiac data limitedN/A23.358.0Consider (Level A)
Carbamazepine43.7NTD 5.6; Cardiac 8.5; Oral cleft 4.7100.417.175.7Alternative option
Phenytoin51.3NTD 2.0; Cardiac 19.9; Oral cleft 9.7103.2N/A14.4Use with caution
Phenobarbital60.3NTD 4.1; Cardiac 41.9; Oral cleft 22.3N/AN/A89.3Must avoid for cardiac (Level A)
Topiramate44.5NTD 1.3; Oral cleft 14.1100.5N/A80.2Avoid for oral clefts + SGA (Level B)
Valproic acid96.7NTD 14.3; Cardiac 25.1; Urogenital 12.4; Renal 13.793.941.9147.1Must avoid (Level A)
Gabapentin30.9Limited dataN/AN/A58.5Insufficient data
Zonisamide39.2Limited dataN/AN/A20.4Insufficient data
Clobazam31.3Very limited data (n = 64)N/AN/A177.1Insufficient data
Clonazepam30.3Limited dataN/A20.8165.4Insufficient data
Primidone101.5Oral cleft 16.6N/AN/A166.0Very limited data

Evidence Classification & GRADE Methodology

AAN Evidence Classification

  • Class I: Lowest risk of bias (e.g., well-designed prospective registries with ≥80% follow-up)
  • Class II: Moderate risk of bias
  • Class III: Higher risk of bias (retrospective, incomplete follow-up, limited controls)
  • Class IV: Highest risk of bias — excluded from this guideline (n = 133 articles)

Modified GRADE Confidence Levels

Starting ConfidenceCriteria
Low (starting point for most)≥2 Class III studies or ≥1 Class I/II study informing comparisons
Very LowSingle Class III study informing the estimate

Upgrading/Downgrading Criteria

  • Upgraded 1 level for large magnitude of effect: MCM/ASD PD >100/1,000 live births or PR >2 or <0.5; IQ RMD >10 points
  • Upgraded 2 levels for very large magnitude: MCM/ASD PD >300/1,000 or PR >10 or <0.1; IQ RMD >20 points
  • Downgraded for imprecision: 95% CI width >100/1,000 for MCMs or >300/1,000 for SGA
  • Downgraded for indirectness: All comparisons are indirect (across different studies/registries)
  • Perinatal outcomes (adjusted PR): Downgraded if CI width >2

Recommendation Levels (Actionable Statements)

LevelLanguageMeaning
A“Must” / “Must not”Strong recommendation; high certainty of benefit or harm
B“Should” / “Should not”Moderate recommendation; moderate certainty
C“May”Weak recommendation; low certainty

Summary of All Recommendations by Evidence Level

Level A (“Must”) Recommendations

#Recommendation
2AMust minimize convulsive seizures (GTC/FBTC) in PWECP during pregnancy
3AMust counsel PWECP that general population MCM rate is 2.4%–2.9% as a comparison framework
3BMust consider lamotrigine, levetiracetam, or oxcarbazepine in PWECP to minimize MCM risk
3CMust avoid valproic acid in PWECP to minimize MCMs/NTDs
3DMust counsel that valproic acid has the highest MCM risk of all studied ASMs
3EMust avoid phenobarbital in PWECP to reduce cardiac malformation risk
5AMust avoid valproic acid in PWECP to reduce risk of poor neurodevelopmental outcomes (ASD, lower IQ)
5BMust counsel PWECP that VPA exposure is likely/possibly associated with decreased IQ vs other ASMs
5CMust counsel PWECP that VPA exposure is possibly associated with increased ASD risk vs other ASMs
6BMust prescribe ≥0.4 mg folic acid daily to possibly improve neurodevelopmental outcomes (ASD, IQ)

Level B (“Should”) Recommendations

#Recommendation
1AShould engage in joint decision-making with PWECP
1BShould recommend optimal ASMs/doses preconceptionally at earliest opportunity
2BShould exercise caution in removing/replacing ASM effective for GTC/FBTC once pregnant
2CShould monitor ASM levels throughout pregnancy
2DShould adjust ASM dose in response to decreasing levels or worsening seizure control
2EShould counsel that limited data exist for understudied ASMs
3FShould avoid phenobarbital and topiramate to reduce oral cleft risk
3GShould avoid valproic acid to reduce urogenital and renal malformation risk
3HShould recommend fetal screening (anatomical ultrasound) for PWECP on any ASM
3IShould recommend cardiac screening of fetus for PWECP on phenobarbital
4AShould counsel that intrauterine death prevalence does not differ among ASMs in monotherapy
4BShould avoid valproic acid or topiramate to minimize SGA risk
4CShould recommend fetal growth screening for PWECP on VPA or topiramate
5DShould implement age-appropriate developmental screening in children exposed to any ASM in utero
6AShould prescribe ≥0.4 mg folic acid daily to decrease NTD risk
6CShould counsel on importance of folic acid adherence

Limitations & Future Research

Key Limitations

  • All comparisons between ASMs are indirect (different registries, populations, time periods) → inherent imprecision
  • Confounders (genetics, seizure type, socioeconomic status, pregnancy conditions) could not always be adjusted
  • Class I evidence was weighted more heavily, but most data comes from Class II–III observational registries
  • Many newer ASMs have no or very limited data: acetazolamide, brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, nitrazepam, perampanel, piracetam, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, vigabatrin
  • Dose-response analyses could not generate standalone recommendations despite EURAP data showing dose effects

Future Research Priorities

  • Pregnancy outcomes for newer ASMs (cenobamate, fenfluramine, lacosamide, zonisamide, clobazam, perampanel)
  • Longitudinal neurodevelopmental outcomes beyond valproic acid comparisons
  • Randomized controlled trials for optimal folic acid dose and timing
  • Impact of socioeconomic status, ethnic/racial diversity on outcomes
  • Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ASMs during pregnancy and postpartum
  • Uniform definitions for high vs low ASM doses
  • Multi-variable analyses to untangle ASM effects from epilepsy syndrome effects

Key Registries Referenced

Major Pregnancy Registries in Evidence Base

RegistryDetails
EURAPEuropean Registry of Antiepileptic Drugs and Pregnancy — prospective, multinational; the only Class I study addressing dose-response for MCMs
UKIEPRUK and Ireland Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register
NAAPRNorth American AED Pregnancy Registry
KREPKerala Registry of Epilepsy and Pregnancy (India)
NEADNeurodevelopmental Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs study — Class I prospective observational study for IQ outcomes
MONEADMaternal Outcomes and Neurodevelopmental Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs study
SCAN-AEDScandinavian study — found higher ASD/intellectual disability with topiramate than VPA