← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

CAN-3110

Persistent T cell activation and cytotoxicity against glioblastoma following single oncolytic virus treatment in a clinical trial

Year of Publication: 2026

Authors: Meylan M, Tian Y, Wu L, ..., Wucherpfennig KW

Journal: Cell

Citation: Cell 2026;189(5):1287-1304.e18

Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.12.055

Bottom Line

A single intratumoral injection of CAN-3110 produced deep and persistent T cell infiltration in recurrent GBM by locally expanding pre-existing tumor-infiltrating T cell clones; shorter GZMB+ CD8 T cell–apoptotic tumor cell distances correlated with longer PFS, and patients with expanded shared TCR repertoires had longer overall survival (445 vs 235 days, p=0.033). Hypoxic mesenchymal tumor regions excluded T cells, identifying a key resistance mechanism.

Major Points

  • Single intratumoral oncolytic HSV-1 (CAN-3110) drives sustained T cell infiltration into rGBM at late time points (months 6–25, including >2 years in one patient).
  • CD8/Treg ratio increased from 6.8 pre to 21.1 post (p=0.0042); CD8 T cell density 30.4 → 138 cells/mm² (p=0.0078); tissue-resident CD8 T cells showed largest expansion (log2FC 3.03).
  • Productive TCR clonality increased in tumor (p=0.032) but not in PBMC; up to 1,024-fold local intratumoral expansion of individual clones.
  • Proximity of GZMB+ CD8 T cells to cleaved caspase-3+ apoptotic tumor cells correlated with better PFS (175 vs 262 µm, p=0.038) and lower tumor growth rate (p=0.028).
  • Pre-existing tumor-infiltrating T cell clones expanded after oHSV; expansion of shared TCR repertoire was associated with median OS 445 vs 235 days (log-rank p=0.033).
  • Xenium spatial TCR mapping showed clonally expanded T cells (median 32.3 vs 51.8 µm) interacted directly with tumor cells with tissue-resident (ITGAE/CD103, ZNF683/HOBIT) and early activation (NR4A1/Nur77, CD69, IFNG, TNF) programs.
  • Residual HSV viral protein and RNA were restricted to necrotic regions in only 4/8 post-treatment samples; T cells were depleted near HSV+ areas (log2FC −3.47 CD8, −2.01 CD4), supporting that late T cell infiltration is driven by tumor antigen rather than viral antigen recognition.
  • Hypoxic mesenchymal (MES-like 2) tumor regions expanded post-treatment (log2FC 1.38, p=0.0078) and excluded T cells (constituting up to 78% of tumor cells in the most distant zones), identifying a spatial resistance mechanism.
  • Dexamethasone use >100 days correlated with reduced T cell clonality (r=−0.414, p=0.04), implicating chronic steroid exposure in impaired immunity.
  • Screening of expanded TCRs against VDJdb, McPAS-TCR, and HSV-specific databases found only 15 of 1,246 clonotypes with known specificities and none matched HSV, consistent with tumor (not viral) antigen reactivity.

Design

Study Type: Translational spatial immunology analysis of phase 1 single-arm clinical trial samples (NCT03152318)

Randomization:

Blinding: Open-label phase 1 trial; spatial/molecular analyses not blinded

Enrollment Period: Parent phase 1 trial enrolled 2018–2022 (Ling et al., 2023)

Follow-up Duration: Tissue collected up to 331 days post-injection (one patient >2 years)

Centers: 1

Countries: USA

Sample Size: 16

Analysis: Paired pre- vs post-treatment within-patient comparisons; Wilcoxon signed-rank, Mann-Whitney, Spearman correlation, Kaplan-Meier with log-rank tests


Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults with histologically confirmed recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM)
  • Disease at first to fourth recurrence
  • Surgically accessible tumor amenable to stereotactic intratumoral injection of oHSV
  • Subsequent surgical resection or biopsy yielding tissue for paired pre/post analysis
  • Baseline Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) 70–100
  • Adequate FFPE tissue quality for CODEX and/or Xenium spatial profiling

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inadequate tumor tissue volume or quality on paired specimens
  • Lack of matched pre-treatment biopsy or post-treatment resection material
  • Insufficient morphological quality for spatial multiplex imaging
  • Inability to undergo intratumoral injection of investigational oHSV
  • (Phase 1 trial standard exclusions for active systemic infection, uncontrolled comorbidities, etc., as per NCT03152318)

Arms

FieldControlPost-oHSV resection
InterventionDiagnostic/baseline rGBM specimen prior to oHSV injectionSingle intratumoral injection of rQNestin34.5v.2 (CAN-3110, linoserpaturev) at escalating doses; tissue collected at subsequent resection for recurrence
DurationBaseline (within-patient control)Single injection; tissue 24–331+ days later

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Change in intratumoral T cell infiltration density (cells/mm²) from pre- to post-oHSV treatment (paired analysis)Primary30.4 cells/mm² (pre-treatment median, Xenium)138 cells/mm² (post-treatment median, Xenium)0.0078 (paired Wilcoxon)
CD8/Treg ratio change pre vs postSecondary6.8 (pre)21.1 (post)0.0042
Productive TCR clonality change in tumorSecondaryPre-treatment baselineIncreased post-oHSV0.032
Productive TCR clonality in PBMCSecondaryPre-treatment baselineUnchanged0.62 (NS)
GZMB+ T cell to apoptotic tumor cell distance — above-median PFS vs belowSecondary262 µm (below median PFS)175 µm (above median PFS)0.038
Overall survival — expanded vs contracted shared TCR repertoireSecondaryMedian 235 days (contracted)Median 445 days (expanded)0.033 (log-rank)
Tissue-resident CD8 T cell expansion (post vs pre, log2FC)SecondaryPre baselinelog2FC = 3.030.0078
Plasma cell expansion (post vs pre, log2FC)SecondaryPre baselinelog2FC = 3.470.0156
MES-like 2 (hypoxic) tumor cell expansion post-treatmentSecondaryPre baselinelog2FC = 1.380.0078
Tumor growth rate vs GZMB+ T cell–tumor distanceSecondaryLarger distanceShorter distance → lower growth0.028
Dexamethasone >100 days vs post-treatment clonalitySecondaryn/ar = −0.414 (Spearman)0.04
NoteAdverseThis spatial/translational publication did not re-report toxicity. Safety/adverse events for the rQNestin34.5v.2 (CAN-3110) phase 1 dose escalation were reported in the parent trial publication (Ling et al., Nature 2023), where single intratumoral injection was generally well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities at the doses studied; common events were headache, seizure, and transient neurologic deficits typical of intracranial procedures.

Subgroup Analysis

Patients with expanded shared TCR repertoire (vs contracted) had significantly longer OS (445 vs 235 days, p=0.033). Patients with above-median PFS had shorter GZMB+ T cell–tumor cell distances (175 vs 262 µm, p=0.038). Dexamethasone exposure >100 days associated with reduced T cell clonality (r=−0.414, p=0.04). Hypoxia/MES-like 2 enrichment correlated with T cell exclusion (r=0.457, p<10e−4).


Criticisms

  • Single-arm, n=16 with paired pre/post comparison — no randomized control arm.
  • Cohort exclusively of European ancestry; demographic associations across ancestral backgrounds not assessable.
  • Translational/correlative analysis of a phase 1 trial, not powered for clinical efficacy endpoints.
  • Tissue available only at recurrence rather than at defined on-treatment time points (intracranial location limits serial biopsy).
  • Only TCRβ chain sequences available for most patients; paired TCRα and antigen specificity not directly established.
  • No matched tumor cell lines available to functionally validate T cell tumor-reactivity.
  • Bulk TCR (not single-cell) for most patients; in situ TCR mapping limited to 2 patients (P28, P34) with the strongest responses, with potential selection bias.
  • Causal direction between immune infiltration and outcomes cannot be established from observational spatial data alone.

Funding

NCI grants P01 CA236749 (KWW & EAC); P01 CA163222, R01 CA238039, R01 CA251599 (KWW); P01 CA163205, R01 NS110942 (EAC); Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (PICI); Cancer Research Institute Immuno-Informatics Fellowship (MM, CRI #CRI5000); Institut Servier and Philippe Foundation mobility grants.

Based on: CAN-3110 (Cell, 2026)

Authors: Meylan M, Tian Y, Wu L, ..., Wucherpfennig KW

Citation: Cell 2026;189(5):1287-1304.e18

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.