Mbiotix-PD
Safety and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Alleviating Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Study
Clinical Question
Does a single donor-derived fecal microbiota transplant, delivered by colonoscopy, improve motor (MDS-UPDRS III “OFF”) and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson disease over 12 months compared with autologous-stool placebo FMT?
Bottom Line
A single colonoscopy-delivered donor FMT did NOT improve the primary motor endpoint (MDS-UPDRS III “OFF”) at 12 months in PD, but produced significant, mostly modest improvements in several non-motor domains (total MDS-NMS, pain, cognition subscale, sexual dysfunction, GI dysfunction) and in EQ-5D quality of life at 12 months. The procedure was safe with only transient GI adverse events.
Major Points
- Design: prospective, parallel-group, randomized 1:1, double-blind, placebo (auto-FMT)-controlled, single-center trial at Medical University of Warsaw / Mazovian Brodnowski Hospital, Poland; enrollment Jan 2022–Aug 2023; 12-month follow-up.
- Population: 59 patients with MDS-criteria PD on oral levodopa, aged 40–75 y (median 65 y Mbiotix / 63 y placebo); 30 female (50.8%), 29 male (49.2%); median symptom duration 5–6 y; baseline LEDD ~796 (Mbiotix) vs ~742 (placebo) mg/day; BMI higher in Mbiotix (27.2 vs 25.8 kg/m², p=0.015).
- Intervention: single 60 g donor stool suspended in 200 mL saline with 10% glycerol, injected into cecum via colonoscopy after 5-day rifaximin + bowel prep; comparator: identically prepared autologous (patient's own) stool.
- Primary outcome (MDS-UPDRS III “OFF” at 12 mo): DiD +1.50 (95% CI −4.28 to 7.28, p=1.00 Bonferroni-adjusted) — no difference; both arms slightly worsened (∆ +3.0 Mbiotix vs +1.5 placebo).
- MDS-UPDRS III “ON” at 1 mo showed early significant benefit (DiD −3.5, 95% CI −5.2 to −1.8, p<0.001) that was not sustained.
- Non-motor: MDS-NMS total at 12 mo DiD −20.3 (95% CI −35.2 to −5.4, adj p=0.030); pain subscale reductions at 1 mo (−3.9), 3 mo (−4.9), and 12 mo (−3.6), all p<0.001; cognition subscale at 3 mo DiD −5.5 (p<0.001); sexual dysfunction at 6 mo DiD −1.8 (p<0.001).
- GI: GIDS-PD at 12 mo DiD −4.4 (95% CI −6.9 to −1.8, p=0.003) favoring FMT; mCAS unchanged.
- Quality of life: EQ-5D at 12 mo DiD +0.03 (95% CI 0.01–0.05, p=0.037) favoring FMT (placebo group declined); PDQ-39 no significant difference.
- MoCA: within-group improvement in Mbiotix (∆ +0.90, p=0.049) but between-group difference NS (DiD 0.6, 95% CI −0.01 to 1.3, p=0.10).
- LEDD unchanged in both arms (12-mo DiD ~−4, p=1.000).
- Safety: only transient GI adverse events (abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, heartburn, nausea, painful defecation, fever); no serious procedure-related events; 36/59 (61%) chose general anesthesia for colonoscopy.
Design
Study Type: Randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo (autologous-FMT)-controlled trial
Randomization: 1
Blinding: Double-blind (patients and clinicians blinded to allocation; only the head of the HBI Manufacturing Laboratory was unblinded to prepare/label samples). Sealed-Envelope software; 1:1; stratified by PD stage (early vs advanced).
Enrollment Period: January 2022 – August 2023
Follow-up Duration: 12 months (assessments at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo; MoCA at baseline and 12 mo)
Centers: 1
Countries: Poland
Sample Size: 59
Power Calculation: Powered on primary DiD estimator at 12 mo (2-sample t-test approximation, Cohen's d = 0.8, 80% power, α=0.05): 21/arm minimum, inflated to 26/arm (52 total) to account for 15–20% attrition.
Analysis: Intention-to-treat using a robust linear mixed-effects model with treatment, time, treatment×time, age, sex, BMI as fixed effects and group-level random effects; robust estimation; predictive-mean-matching imputation for missing data (assumed MNAR); DiD estimator; Bonferroni adjustment across 4 timepoints (adjusted α=0.0125); effect sizes as Cohen's d.
Inclusion Criteria
- Diagnosis of Parkinson disease per MDS clinical diagnostic criteria
- Ongoing oral levodopa treatment
- Age 40–75 years
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Contraindications for colonoscopy (history of gastrointestinal perforation or obstruction)
- Post-radiotherapy status of the abdominal or rectal area
- Severe heart, kidney, or liver failure
- Coagulation disorders
- Congenital or acquired immune deficiencies
- Current viral, bacterial, or fungal infection
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm requiring surgery
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Treatment with dopaminergic infusion therapies
- Deep brain stimulation
- Colorectal polyps at colonoscopy (except lesions <5 mm classified as NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic type I) or other potentially neoplastic changes
- Strong food allergy with history of anaphylaxis
- Stool positive for MDR/pathogenic bacteria (MRSA, KPC, MBL- or ESBL-producing organisms, VRE, Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia)
Arms
| Field | Mbiotix (donor FMT) | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Single donor-derived FMT: 60 g SuperDonor stool in 200 mL 0.9% NaCl with 10% glycerol (Mbiotix, Human Biome Institute), stored at −80°C and thawed at room temperature, delivered into cecum via colonoscopy after 5-day rifaximin 400 mg PO tid + bowel prep with macrogol 4000. | Single autologous FMT: identically prepared 60 g suspension of the patient's own stool (collected before antibiotic pretreatment) in 200 mL 0.9% NaCl with 10% glycerol, delivered into cecum via colonoscopy after 5-day rifaximin 400 mg PO tid + bowel prep. |
| N | 28 | 31 |
Outcomes
| Outcome | Type | Control | Intervention | HR / OR / RR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in MDS-UPDRS Part III (motor examination) “OFF” state score from baseline to 12 months, Mbiotix vs placebo (auto-FMT). | Primary | 12-mo EMM 24.0 (95% CI 19.9–28.1); change from baseline +1.5 (95% CI −0.6 to 3.7) | 12-mo EMM 24.5 (95% CI 20.6–28.4); change from baseline +3.0 (95% CI 1.0 to 5.0) | 1.00 (Bonferroni-adjusted across 4 timepoints) | |
| MDS-UPDRS III “ON” at 1 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ +1.5 [+0.3, +2.7] | ∆ −2.0 [−3.2, −0.8] | <0.001 | |
| MDS-UPDRS III “ON” at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ +1.6 | ∆ +0.4 | 0.168 | |
| MoCA at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ +0.30 | ∆ +0.90 | 0.10 (adjusted) | |
| MDS-UPDRS I at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ +0.6 | ∆ −0.1 | 0.028 | |
| MDS-UPDRS II at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ 0.0 | ∆ −1.0 | <0.001 | |
| MDS-UPDRS IV at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ −0.5 | ∆ −0.3 | 1.000 | |
| MDS-NMS total at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ −1.2 | ∆ −21.5 | 0.030 | |
| MDS-NMS cognition subscale at 3 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ −0.1 | ∆ −5.5 | <0.001 | |
| MDS-NMS sexual dysfunction at 6 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ +0.7 | ∆ −1.1 | <0.001 | |
| MDS-NMS pain at 1 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ −0.2 | ∆ −4.1 | <0.001 | |
| MDS-NMS pain at 3 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ +1.8 | ∆ −3.2 | <0.001 | |
| MDS-NMS pain at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ 0.0 | ∆ −3.6 | <0.001 | |
| MDS-NMS 'other' (fatigue/weight/sweating/olfaction) at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ +2.76 | ∆ −2.9 | <0.001 | |
| GIDS-PD total at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ +1.2 | ∆ −3.2 | 0.003 | |
| mCAS at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ −0.2 | ∆ −0.8 | 0.768 | |
| PDQ-39 at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ +3.6 | ∆ −0.8 | 0.296 | |
| EQ-5D at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ −0.03 | ∆ 0.00 | 0.037 | |
| LEDD (mg) at 12 mo (DiD) | Secondary | ∆ +18 | ∆ +67 | 1.000 | |
| Any procedure-related adverse event | Safety | same profile | transient GI symptoms only (abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, heartburn, epigastric fullness, nausea, painful defecation, fever) | ||
| Serious adverse events attributed to procedure | Safety | 0/31 | 0/28 | ||
| Colonoscopy performed under general anesthesia | Safety | 16/31 (52%) | 19/28 (68%) | ||
| Discontinuations | Safety | — | 1 randomized patient excluded intra-procedure for pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis (before FMT); 1 patient lost to follow-up after visit 1 |
Subgroup Analysis
Randomization was stratified by PD stage (early vs advanced), but no formal subgroup analyses of primary/secondary outcomes by stage, sex, or symptom duration are reported. Authors discuss that Bruggemann et al. (GUT-PARFECT) recruited only early-stage patients (shorter disease duration, lower LEDD) and reported motor benefit, suggesting a possible early-PD-specific effect that this mixed cohort could not detect.
Criticisms
- Small sample (N=59) with wide confidence intervals — the primary MDS-UPDRS III OFF DiD 95% CI (−4.28 to 7.28) spans clinically important benefit and harm, so a modest true effect cannot be excluded (type II error risk acknowledged by authors).
- Single-center trial in Warsaw, Poland — limited generalizability.
- Mixed early and advanced PD population; higher baseline LEDD (~750–800 mg) than GUT-PARFECT's early-PD cohort, which is where prior FMT motor benefit was seen — the negative primary result may reflect stage selection.
- Single FMT dose — authors themselves hypothesize that repeated dosing may be required to sustain the early MDS-UPDRS III 'ON' benefit and to produce OFF-state effects.
- Multiple secondary endpoints with Bonferroni adjustment only across 4 timepoints (not across scales) — the many positive non-motor subscale findings should be considered exploratory / hypothesis-generating.
- No detailed microbiome baseline typing or body-first vs brain-first phenotyping; abnormal baseline microbiota was not an inclusion criterion, unlike Scheperjans's cohort.
- Baseline BMI imbalance (higher in Mbiotix, p=0.015) despite randomization — handled via covariate adjustment in the mixed model but residual confounding possible.
- Blinding integrity of autologous vs donor FMT not formally assessed (both products identically packaged and stored, but no post-trial guess questionnaire reported).
- Sponsor conflict of interest: last-author J. Biliński is a shareholder of Human Biome Institute, the manufacturer of Mbiotix.
Funding
Biocodex Microbiota Foundation National Grant 2021; Medical University of Warsaw grants 09/M/MBS/N/21, 1/Z/MG/24, NZP/1/Z/MG/N/23, and M/MG/77/22. Funders had no role in design or interpretation. Mbiotix product supplied by Human Biome Institute (Warsaw, Poland).
Based on: Mbiotix-PD (Annals of Neurology, 2026)
Authors: Figura M, Milanowski Ł, Nowak JM, et al.
Citation: Ann Neurol 2026;100(1):10–21. DOI: 10.1002/ana.78153
Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.